2015
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2014.2348197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Incentives for Congestion Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a dynamic mechanism generally implies a closed-loop feedback system, which needs part of its control to be placed at the end-systems and may require modifications in the end-user application interfaces [174], [175]. Moreover, the user's end of the control also becomes vulnerable to manipulation by selfish users to their individual advantage [176].…”
Section: Providing the Right Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a dynamic mechanism generally implies a closed-loop feedback system, which needs part of its control to be placed at the end-systems and may require modifications in the end-user application interfaces [174], [175]. Moreover, the user's end of the control also becomes vulnerable to manipulation by selfish users to their individual advantage [176].…”
Section: Providing the Right Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in aggregative games has surged in recent years due to their suitability to model decision problems in various application domains: from demand-side management for the smart grid, [1] and for electric vehicles, [2], [3], to wireless systems, [4], network congestion control, [5] and competitive markets, [6]. Aggregative games are non-cooperative games in which each (player's) agent's cost depends on some aggregate effect of all other agents' actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregative games play an important role in many applications, such as communication networks, smart grids, and market economics . In aggregative games, the cost function of every player relies on not only its own decision variable but also the aggregate of the decision of all players.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%