2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-016-0562-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic iteration stopping algorithm for non-binary LDPC-coded high-order PRCPM in the Rayleigh fading channel

Abstract: This paper mainly studies the association between non-binary low-density parity-check codes and high-order partial response continuous phase modulation, which prevents information loss in the mutual conversion of bit and symbol probabilities. Although the iterative detection and decoding technique applied in this system can obtain good performance/complexity tradeoff, the iterative process still encounters the problems of positive feedback and relatively large decoding delay, similar to other iterative coded m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the frame size (N) was set to either 1000, 5000, or 10,000 for each data transmission. The turbo code generator (in octal) and code rate values were (7,5), (17,15), (37,21), and (1/2, 1/3). The codes were simulated under the AWGN channel, and the maximum iteration number max () I was set to 8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, the frame size (N) was set to either 1000, 5000, or 10,000 for each data transmission. The turbo code generator (in octal) and code rate values were (7,5), (17,15), (37,21), and (1/2, 1/3). The codes were simulated under the AWGN channel, and the maximum iteration number max () I was set to 8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the BER performances of the CESC and FISC are the same for the threshold values of 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001. (17,15), the threshold values of 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001 can terminate early at 2.9, 3, and 3 AIN, respectively, representing reductions of around 65%, 65%, and 63.75% compared to FISC. The BER performances of the CESC and FISC were the same at thresholds of 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001.…”
Section: Performance Of the Cesc With Different Turbo Code Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations