1986
DOI: 10.13182/nt86-a33804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Logical Analytical Methodology Versus Fault Tree: The Case Study of the Auxiliary Feedwater System of a Nuclear Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following an initiating event, the dynamic event tree approach [5,22] tracks the possible branchings in the system evolution at specified time intervals through simulation. The simulations stop when a specified number of time intervals or the top event are reached.…”
Section: Dynamic Reliability Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following an initiating event, the dynamic event tree approach [5,22] tracks the possible branchings in the system evolution at specified time intervals through simulation. The simulations stop when a specified number of time intervals or the top event are reached.…”
Section: Dynamic Reliability Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of these differences even in such a simple case is an argument in favour of a dynamic reliability analysis even if the required efforts (software complexity and CPU time) are undoubtedly larger. The dynamic approach has also been compared with the well-known DYLAM methodology [21]. The results show a good agreement between the two with reference to the tank problem of Figure 4: in this case component #2 has a flow rate Q 2 = Qt/2.…”
Section: Monte Carlo In Dynamic Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Currently, the DETs are the most popular approach to discrete-time dynamic PSA. Dynamical logical methodology (DYLAM) (Amendola and Reina, 1984;Cacciabue et al, 1986;Cojazzi, 1996) is the first methodology proposed that uses DETs.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Research | Nuclear Energymentioning
confidence: 99%