2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling and validation of absorber and desorber columns for post-combustion CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a has a shape typical for absorber columns as demonstrated by experimental investigations as well as 1D simulation models (see e.g. Gaspar and Cormos, 2010;Harun et al, 2011).…”
Section: Fig 5 Distributions Of Gas and Liquid Temperatures (A) Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a has a shape typical for absorber columns as demonstrated by experimental investigations as well as 1D simulation models (see e.g. Gaspar and Cormos, 2010;Harun et al, 2011).…”
Section: Fig 5 Distributions Of Gas and Liquid Temperatures (A) Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption is valid for cases involving solvents with rapid kinetics such as MEA (Kenig et al 2001). Reaction kinetics have also been described more accurately by introducing an enhancement factor (Kvamsdal and Rochelle 2008;Kvamsdal et al 2009;Gáspár and Cormoş 2011;Harun et al 2011;Khan et al 2011;Flø 2015) or using actual reaction kinetics model (Aboudheir et al 2003;Posch and Haider, 2013).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic models by Lawal et al (2009a, b), Lawal et al (2010), Gáspár and Cormoş (2011) and MacDowell et al (2013) were validated at steady state conditions only over limited conditions at pilot scale due to lack of experimental data for detailed validations as at the time of their publications (Chikukwa et al 2012). Validation of dynamic models under state steady state and dynamic conditions have also been attempted by Biliyok et al (2012).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For validation of the developed model a considerable number of trials were chosen to compare simulation results with plant data (NIST, 2011;Gaspar et al, 2010;Perry et al, 1999;Tobiensen et al, 2008, Silva et al, 2003 and the two most representative cases are presented in Table 1, which emphasizes the small differences between the plant data and simulated values. The accuracy of the distributed parameter nonlinear mathematical model of the process is highlighted by the evolutions of 2-ethyl-hexenal, 2-ethyl-hexanol concentrations and the temperature evolution along the reactor height, presented in Figure 2 …”
Section: Mathematical Models Distributed Parameter Nonlinear Mathematmentioning
confidence: 99%