2011
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0b013e3182291b40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (F-18 FET) PET for Glioma Grading

Abstract: Early-to-middle SUV tumor ratio and Tpeak were the best indices for assessing the grading of gliomas. Since early-to-middle ratio derives from the first 35 minutes of the dynamic acquisition, the PET study could last half an hour instead of 1 hour. By logistic regression, it is possible to assess the individual probability of high-grade, useful for prognosis and treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
118
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
118
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…10 With respect to differentiation between lowand high-grade histology, it has been become clear, however, that conventional analyses of 18 F-FET PET with determination of static values such as the ratio of maximal 18 F-FET uptake within the tumor as compared to the background (SUV max /BG) lack specificity and sensitivity; this is explained by the marked overlap of the distributions of the uptake ratios in low-and high-grade tumors. 11 In contrast, dynamic analysis of 18 F-FET uptake over a period of 40 min has been shown to enable noninvasive tumor grading with high diagnostic power 12,13 : "Increasing" time-activity curves (TAC) of 18 F-FET uptake, with standard uptake values (SUV) constantly ascending or reaching a peak followed by a plateau has been demonstrated to indicate low-grade histology. "Decreasing" TAC, with SUVs exhibiting an early peak followed by a constant descend, correlate with a high-grade phenotype.…”
Section: O-(2-[mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 With respect to differentiation between lowand high-grade histology, it has been become clear, however, that conventional analyses of 18 F-FET PET with determination of static values such as the ratio of maximal 18 F-FET uptake within the tumor as compared to the background (SUV max /BG) lack specificity and sensitivity; this is explained by the marked overlap of the distributions of the uptake ratios in low-and high-grade tumors. 11 In contrast, dynamic analysis of 18 F-FET uptake over a period of 40 min has been shown to enable noninvasive tumor grading with high diagnostic power 12,13 : "Increasing" time-activity curves (TAC) of 18 F-FET uptake, with standard uptake values (SUV) constantly ascending or reaching a peak followed by a plateau has been demonstrated to indicate low-grade histology. "Decreasing" TAC, with SUVs exhibiting an early peak followed by a constant descend, correlate with a high-grade phenotype.…”
Section: O-(2-[mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-to-peak (TTP; time in minutes from the beginning of the dynamic acquisition up to the maximum SUV of the lesion) was determined. Furthermore, as previously descibed (12,20), the TACs of each lesion were assigned to one of the following curve patterns: Constantly increasing 18 F-FET uptake without identifiable peak uptake (pattern I);…”
Section: Pet Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies, a variety of methods were used for computing TBR: (1) a region-of-interest (ROI) manually drawn around the tumor based on T1-and/ or T2-weighted MR images [18][19][20], or (2) increased FET uptake [8,[21][22][23][24], (3) automated ROI drawing of the area with increased FET uptake [3 standard deviations of the mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of a control region [25], or (4) based on a 90 % SUV max threshold isocontour Studies without data to compute specificity (n = 10 studies, N = 261 pat.) Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen studies [8,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] with a total of N = 641 patients (Table 1) were eligible for inclusion in the present metaanalysis. Six studies had mixed populations with both primary brain tumor and recurrence (#1, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14, Table 1) and one did not report histology results for all patients (#2, Table 1).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation