2021
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2021.3096121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Privacy-Aware Collaborative Schemes for Average Computation: A Multi-Time Reporting Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there has been increasing focus on compensating the privacy loss of data sellers in data pricing models. 4 Shen et al 5 proposed a balanced pricing mechanism that computes the price of a noisy aggregated query answer and compensates the data owner according to the degree of privacy loss. The work 6 presents a query-based trading mechanism for data market, where data consumers purchase a targeted aggregation query under a certain perturbation and data owners are compensated for the actual privacy loss brought by the query.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there has been increasing focus on compensating the privacy loss of data sellers in data pricing models. 4 Shen et al 5 proposed a balanced pricing mechanism that computes the price of a noisy aggregated query answer and compensates the data owner according to the degree of privacy loss. The work 6 presents a query-based trading mechanism for data market, where data consumers purchase a targeted aggregation query under a certain perturbation and data owners are compensated for the actual privacy loss brought by the query.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been increasing focus on compensating the privacy loss of data sellers in data pricing models 4 . Shen et al 5 proposed a balanced pricing mechanism that computes the price of a noisy aggregated query answer and compensates the data owner according to the degree of privacy loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%