Geotechnical Characterization, Field Measurement, and Laboratory Testing of Municipal Solid Waste 2011
DOI: 10.1061/41146(395)4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Properties of Municipal Solid Waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average depth of waste from the surface of the landfill to the leachate collection system at the time when the experiment was conducted was approximately 20 m. The apparent in situ bulk density of the landfilled waste was estimated to be approximately 700 kg/m 3 ; the apparent in situ bulk density was estimated based on the mass of waste deposited in the landfill and the landfill volume estimated by topographic surveys of the site. The density was within the reported range of 300 kg/m 3 to 2,100 kg/m 3 for compacted waste [ 10 , 11 ]. A clayey-sandy soil mined on site was used as daily cover.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The average depth of waste from the surface of the landfill to the leachate collection system at the time when the experiment was conducted was approximately 20 m. The apparent in situ bulk density of the landfilled waste was estimated to be approximately 700 kg/m 3 ; the apparent in situ bulk density was estimated based on the mass of waste deposited in the landfill and the landfill volume estimated by topographic surveys of the site. The density was within the reported range of 300 kg/m 3 to 2,100 kg/m 3 for compacted waste [ 10 , 11 ]. A clayey-sandy soil mined on site was used as daily cover.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Their results demonstrated that the brous waste constituents had signi cant impact on the sti ness and material damping of MSW. The reported data were in accordance with the ndings by Zekkos [32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It should be noted that, depending on the size of the prepared specimen, limitations exist on the maximum advisable particle size. In this regard, referring to Zekkos [32], the maximum size of sti bulky waste particles was considered 1/6 the specimen diameter while for soft brous waste particles, the size was limited to 1/3 the specimen diameter. Therefore, some components were removed prior to sample preparation to prevent the possible problems (such as unexpected tearing of membrane) in prepared samples.…”
Section: Materials Characterization and Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations