2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020ja028215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Properties of Particle Injections Inside Geosynchronous Orbit: A Multisatellite Case Study

Abstract: Four closely located satellites at and inside geosynchronous orbit (GEO) provided a great opportunity to study the dynamical evolution and spatial scale of premidnight energetic particle injections inside GEO during a moderate substorm on 23 December 2016. Just following the substorm onset, the four spacecraft, a LANL satellite at GEO, the two Van Allen Probes (also called "RBSP") at~5.8 R E , and a THEMIS satellite at~5.3 R E , observed substorm-related particle injections and local dipolarizations near the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a single, deeply penetrating DF (sharp dipolarization) directly drives a dispersionless injection at/inside GEO, the injection region will represent a localized signature in the azimuthal direction. Recently, longitudinally separated multipoint satellite measurements from GOES (Nagai et al., 2019) and Van Allen Probes (Motoba, Ohtani, Claudepierre, et al., 2020) spacecraft provided evidence for azimuthally localized injection regions at/inside GEO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a single, deeply penetrating DF (sharp dipolarization) directly drives a dispersionless injection at/inside GEO, the injection region will represent a localized signature in the azimuthal direction. Recently, longitudinally separated multipoint satellite measurements from GOES (Nagai et al., 2019) and Van Allen Probes (Motoba, Ohtani, Claudepierre, et al., 2020) spacecraft provided evidence for azimuthally localized injection regions at/inside GEO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of coordinated in-situ and context imaging measurements prevents quantitative evaluation of how the energy and mass carried by these flows is redistributed through the inner magnetosphere as they slow and stop. Evidence from multi-spacecraft case studies (Motoba et al, 2020) supports the long-suspected [e.g., Turner et al (2015) and Turner et al (2017)] and references therein connection between BBFs and the particle injections that supply the ring current (Gkioulidou et al, 2014), as well as radiation belt source and seed particles (Jaynes et al, 2015).…”
Section: Objective 3 Science Question 3a: To What Degree Does the Dyn...mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A network of magnetic field sensors and rapidly refreshing total density maps are required to end long-persistent questions about the flow spatial structure and deceleration in the inner magnetosphere (e.g., Reeves et al, 1996;Wiltberger et al, 2015;Khoo et al, 2018)). A network of energetic electron flux measurements are required to definitively connect flow deceleration with electron injection spatial and temporal evolution, including energy-dependent radial penetration (Li et al, 2011;Turner et al, 2015;Turner et al, 2017;Khoo et al, 2018;Glocer et al, 2020;Motoba et al, 2020;Allison et al, 2021). Embedded within the density image plane, in-situ ground-truth observations are needed.…”
Section: Objective 3 Science Question 3a: To What Degree Does the Dyn...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFs or magnetic pulses have a duration of tens of seconds or a short time (≤ 4 min) and propagates toward the Earth (e.g., Nakamura et al, 2002;Runov et al, 2009;Tang CL et al, 2010, 2016a. In general, electron injections in the Earth's outer radiation belt are associated with DFs (e.g., Dai L et al, 2015;Turner et al, 2015Turner et al, , 2016Motoba et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%