2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic reconstruction for atom probe tomography

Abstract: Progress in the reconstruction for atom probe tomography has been limited since the first implementation of the protocol proposed by Bas et al. in 1995. This approach and those subsequently developed assume that the geometric parameters used to build the three-dimensional atom map are constant over the course of an analysis. Here, we test this assumption within the analyses of low-alloyed materials. By building upon methods recently proposed to measure the tomographic reconstruction parameters, we demonstrate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aberrations are limited to atoms near the interface over distances close to three interatomic distances. Although 3D reconstruction procedure has been proposed to overcome the local magnification, the application is limited (Gault et al, 2011;Marquis & Vurpillot, 2008;Oberdorfer & Schmitz, 2011). For example, the modified 3D reconstruction algorithm is applied to an AlZnMg alloy containing Zn-and Mg-rich particles (Geuser et al, 2007).…”
Section: Local Magnification Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aberrations are limited to atoms near the interface over distances close to three interatomic distances. Although 3D reconstruction procedure has been proposed to overcome the local magnification, the application is limited (Gault et al, 2011;Marquis & Vurpillot, 2008;Oberdorfer & Schmitz, 2011). For example, the modified 3D reconstruction algorithm is applied to an AlZnMg alloy containing Zn-and Mg-rich particles (Geuser et al, 2007).…”
Section: Local Magnification Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the shape of the precipitates near the top of the analysis appears flattened, whereas relatively spherical precipitates can be observed near the bottom of the tip. This might be caused by the progressive change in the reconstruction parameters [46] that is not taken into account in the reconstruction protocol implemented in the commercial software package used to build these reconstructions. This will affect the values of the average aspect ratio of precipitates listed in Tables 1 and 2 maybe more than other experimental conditions.…”
Section: Al-agmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern development of Atom Probe Tomography (APT) has opened new exciting opportunities for material design due to its ability to experimentally map atoms with chemistry in a 3D space [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, the challenges exist to accurately reconstruct the 3D atomic structure and to more precisely identify features (for example, precipitates and interfaces) from the 3D data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%