2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-014-9966-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response and Identification of Critical Points in the Superstructure of a Vehicle Using a Combination of Numerical and Experimental Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) are comparable to the ones of the linear terms. To this end, the simulation of the structure is succeeded using a variant of the Newmark's method [2]. A random displacement base excitation ( ) is used as an input to the system and the calculated acceleration responses of a subset of the DOFs (see below), noise-corrupted with 15% measurement error, are considered as the available output measurements.…”
Section: A Spring-mass-damper Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) are comparable to the ones of the linear terms. To this end, the simulation of the structure is succeeded using a variant of the Newmark's method [2]. A random displacement base excitation ( ) is used as an input to the system and the calculated acceleration responses of a subset of the DOFs (see below), noise-corrupted with 15% measurement error, are considered as the available output measurements.…”
Section: A Spring-mass-damper Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main challenge involved in the updating procedures pertains to the oftentimes large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) involved. To tackle with this problem, appropriate substructuring methods in either the time or the frequency domain have been developed and are commonly employed [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frame and fork parts were hung up using a crane and straps, to approximate free-free boundary conditions for the test. First, all the necessary elements of the FRF matrix required for determining the response of the substructures were determined by imposing impulsive loading [5][6][7][8][9]. The measured frequency range was 0-2048 Hz, which includes the analytical frequency range of interest for the frame, 0-600 Hz, as well as for the fork parts, 0-500 Hz.…”
Section: Experimental Modal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural model parameter estimation based on measured modal data (e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]) are often formulated as weighted least-squares estimation problems in which metrics, measuring the residuals between measured and model predicted modal characteristics, are build up into a single weighted residuals metric formed as a weighted average of the multiple individual metrics using weighting factors. Standard gradient-based optimization techniques are then used to find the optimal values of the structural parameters that minimize the single weighted residuals metric representing an overall measure of fit between measured and model predicted modal characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural model parameter estimation based on measured modal data (e.g. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]) are often formulated as weighted least-squares estimation problems in which metrics, measuring the residuals between measured and model predicted modal characteristics, are build up into a single weighted residuals metric formed as a weighted average of the multiple individual metrics using weighting factors. Standard gradient-based optimization techniques are then used to find the optimal values of the structural parameters that minimize the single weighted residuals metric representing an overall measure of fit between measured and model predicted modal characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%