Advances and Trends in Structures and Dynamics 1985
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-032789-1.50055-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response of Mechanical Systems by a Weak Hamiltonian Formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Borri [14] notes that the trailing terms should be written as momenta (P ) and not explicitly as (∂L/∂q). A mixed formulation makes this possible.…”
Section: Hamilton's Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borri [14] notes that the trailing terms should be written as momenta (P ) and not explicitly as (∂L/∂q). A mixed formulation makes this possible.…”
Section: Hamilton's Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, let us denow with L(q, q, t ) the Lagrangean of the system, Q the set of nonconservative generalized forces applied to the system, and p = aL/aq the set of generalized momenta. Then tlie following variational equation, 1;nown as HWP [5], describes the real motion of tlie s p e m between the two known tiines t o and t f :…”
Section: Hamilton's Weak Principle For Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to derive an uiicondition,?! !~-stable algoritlini in [5]$reduced/selective integration had to be used. Further c o l~l i~u~~-tional advantages may be obtcned in so-called mixed formulations of H U T in 11-hich the generalized coordinates and momenta appear as independent unknowns [ 71.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible approach is the use of the finite element in time method (FET) based on Hamilton's principle [14][15][16][17], in which the solution for all the spatial degrees of freedom at all time steps within a given time interval of interest is sought via a set of algebraic equations. Some recent development has shown that this approach offers several potential advantages over numerical solution of ordinary differential equations in the time domain, including the flexibility in formulating the problem directly from system energy expressions, the greater accuracy at specific time points of interest, and the use of adaptive finite elements to improve computational efficiency and accuracy [14,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%