2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic response of plant genome to ultraviolet radiation and other genotoxic stresses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, information on the transcriptional regulation of DSB repair genes is rather limited. In plants, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase regulates the transcriptional DNA damage response, which is highly specific to DSB-inducing genotoxins rather than a general response to DNA damage (Molinier et al, 2005). In our study, transcriptional up-regulation of the NHEJ-related genes AtKU80, AtXRCC4, and AtLig4 in addition to AtPoll in wild-type Arabidopsis seedlings after high NaCl and MMC treatments (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, information on the transcriptional regulation of DSB repair genes is rather limited. In plants, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase regulates the transcriptional DNA damage response, which is highly specific to DSB-inducing genotoxins rather than a general response to DNA damage (Molinier et al, 2005). In our study, transcriptional up-regulation of the NHEJ-related genes AtKU80, AtXRCC4, and AtLig4 in addition to AtPoll in wild-type Arabidopsis seedlings after high NaCl and MMC treatments (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, Boyko et al (2010a) were able to detect such an effect, but only in the first generation of progeny. Similarly, in contrast with Molinier et al (2005) and Yao et al (2011), who found a seven-or threefold increase in recombination frequency, respectively, as a result of UV-C irradiation in Arabidopsis, Van der Auwera et al (2008) did not find a significant effect of UV-C in their SHR lines containing GUS recombination reporter (Van der Auwera et al, 2008). Furthermore, in contrast with earlier results (Kovalchuk et al, 2001b;Boyko et al, 2005), Van der Auwera et al (2008) reported that the presence of heavy metals, such as lead or cadmium ions, a heat shock of 50˚C, or growth at elevated temperatures and increased daylength had no measurable effect on the mutation or recombination frequencies .…”
Section: Conflicting Results From Shr Reporter Linesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Analysis of several independent reporter lines carrying these marker genes indicated that the average somatic recombination frequency detected with the LUC transgene was ;10-fold higher (10 25 ) in Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants compared with GUS recombination frequencies (Ilnytskyy et al, 2004). Using such GUS-or LUC-based SHR reporter lines, it was shown that abiotic and especially biotic stresses lead to enhanced somatic recombination (Kovalchuk et al, 1998(Kovalchuk et al, , 2001a(Kovalchuk et al, , 2001b(Kovalchuk et al, , 2003Lucht et al, 2002;Filkowski et al, 2004;Ilnytskyy et al, 2004;Molinier et al, 2004Molinier et al, , 2005Molinier et al, , 2006Schuermann et al, 2005). Using such a system, it was also discovered that plants can remember a stress perceived in one generation for several following generations.…”
Section: Somatic Homologous Recombination Reporter Lines: Lack Of Sufmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many stresses were shown to alter the frequency of somatic homologous recombination (HRF), including gamma-and Xrays, exposures to UV-C and UV-B, treatments with chemicals causing oxidative stress, herbicides as well as changes in temperature and water regimes and infection with pathogens (Besplug et al 2004;Boyko et al 2005Boyko et al , 2010aFilkowski et al 2004;Kathiria et al 2010;Kovalchuk et al 2000;Lucht et al 2002;Molinier et al 2005;Pecinka et al 2009;Ries et al 2000;Yao and Kovalchuk 2011). The influence of stress on the frequency of homologous recombination cannot be underestimated since HR is able to rearrange the plant genome substantially, thus leading to loss of heterozygocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%