2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic responses and damage behavior of hollow RC piers against rockfall impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Hstand is the effective elevation of the landslide surface, and Hi is the elevation of th bridge pier bottom, χ is the effective width of the impact surface, taken as 0.85 for a circu lar cross-section. The impact energy of the debris particles under different pier arrangement scheme calculated according to Equation (12), is shown in Figure 16. From the analysis in Figur 16, it can be seen that the reduction in impact energy of the debris bodies was not signifi cant in the arrangements of y = 0 m, 3 m, and 6 m. However, when y = 9 m, the impac energy on the bridge pier was significantly reduced, indicating that under a smaller latera slope terrain on both sides, the sliding debris particles have a certain clustering effec which promotes the intensification of disaster damage in the central area of the V-shape valley.…”
Section: Impact Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Hstand is the effective elevation of the landslide surface, and Hi is the elevation of th bridge pier bottom, χ is the effective width of the impact surface, taken as 0.85 for a circu lar cross-section. The impact energy of the debris particles under different pier arrangement scheme calculated according to Equation (12), is shown in Figure 16. From the analysis in Figur 16, it can be seen that the reduction in impact energy of the debris bodies was not signifi cant in the arrangements of y = 0 m, 3 m, and 6 m. However, when y = 9 m, the impac energy on the bridge pier was significantly reduced, indicating that under a smaller latera slope terrain on both sides, the sliding debris particles have a certain clustering effec which promotes the intensification of disaster damage in the central area of the V-shape valley.…”
Section: Impact Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a lateral offset y = 0 m or y = 3 m of the pier, the impact angl θ changed from 0° to 30°; the impact energy of the bridge pier did not change significantl with the increase of the impact angle, but when the impact angle θ was changed from 30 to 45°, the impact energy significantly increased. When the lateral offset of the #1 pie column was y = 6 m or y = 9 m, the change in impact energy was relatively small at a The impact energy of the debris particles under different pier arrangement schemes, calculated according to Equation (12), is shown in Figure 16. From the analysis in Figure 16, it can be seen that the reduction in impact energy of the debris bodies was not significant in the arrangements of y = 0 m, 3 m, and 6 m. However, when y = 9 m, the impact energy on the bridge pier was significantly reduced, indicating that under a smaller lateral slope terrain on both sides, the sliding debris particles have a certain clustering effect, which promotes the intensification of disaster damage in the central area of the V-shaped valley.…”
Section: Impact Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They established the relationship between maximum impact force and impact distance, as well as debris flow volume. Zhao et al [15] conducted impact tests on reinforced concrete hollow piers to study the impact force, internal forces, and failure modes. They analyzed the effects of parameters including rock diameter, impact velocity, and pier reinforcement ratio on the dynamic response and damage modes of the piers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%