“…Female choice is often cited as an evolutionary mechanism in sexually dichromatic vertebrates when males are the ‘brighter’ sex (Salthe, ; Andersson, ; Kodric‐Brown & Brown, ; Wiens et al ., ; Cooper & Hosey, ; Todd & Davis, ; Caro, ) and is a more common component of courtship in frogs with prolonged breeding than in those with explosive breeding (Wells, ). Therefore, whereas behavioural studies and observations in dynamically dichromatic frogs indicate that temporary sexual colour differences serve as intrasexual signals (Wells, ; Sztatecsny et al ., ; Rehberg‐Besler et al ., ), ontogenetic (permanent) colour differences, which are subject to natural and sexual selection year‐round, may be more likely to serve as intersexual signals of mate quality (Vásquez & Pfennig, ; Maan & Cummings, ). Hylid genera with monochromatic, dynamically dichromatic and ontogenetically dichromatic species ( Scinax, Dendropsophus and Hypsiboas ) present an ideal opportunity to address these hypotheses with natural history observations of courtship behaviours (e.g.…”