2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic simulation and parametric sensitivity study in reactive CO 2 capture systems – A solvent comparison study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a large number of pilot plant data is openly available, the number of dynamic operating data limited. Dynamic model validation against steady-state data is beneficial [54,55,56,57,58], however, it doesn't automatically correspond to dynamic operation. Several studies have validated dynamic models against dynamic pilot scale plant data [59,60,61] and demonstration scale plant data [62,63].…”
Section: Steady-state and Dynamic Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a large number of pilot plant data is openly available, the number of dynamic operating data limited. Dynamic model validation against steady-state data is beneficial [54,55,56,57,58], however, it doesn't automatically correspond to dynamic operation. Several studies have validated dynamic models against dynamic pilot scale plant data [59,60,61] and demonstration scale plant data [62,63].…”
Section: Steady-state and Dynamic Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, three cases are simulated within UniSim Design R450, which can be used to determine energy-efficient solutions (including the identification of the most appropriate operating conditions) [9,29]. The relevant thermodynamic data for the CO 2 capture subsystem was calculated by using the Amine package/Li-Mather method.…”
Section: Simulation Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential solution for the carbon mitigation from fossil-fired power plants is the use of CO 2 capture technologies, which can be divided into three different categories: pre-combustion, oxy-fuel, and post-combustion CO 2 capture [1,[4][5][6]. The post-combustion CO 2 capture based on monoethanolamine (MEA) is one of the most feasible approaches and recognized as the first choice for most demonstration projects due to its high technical maturity, large-scale applicability, and strong ability to remove CO 2 from low-CO 2 -concentration flue gas [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%