2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.c031433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Simulation of Aircraft Environmental Control System Based on Flowmaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tool-centric: Specific tools are used to control and orchestrate co-simulation process. In our previous researches [21,20], we developed a platform to manage co-simulation between AMESim [40], Flowmaster [34], Saber [8], Matlab/Simulink [26] and LMS Motion [27]. Co-simulation between hardware and software: Hardware and software communicate with each other in order to implement real-time simulation [19,14].…”
Section: Definitions and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool-centric: Specific tools are used to control and orchestrate co-simulation process. In our previous researches [21,20], we developed a platform to manage co-simulation between AMESim [40], Flowmaster [34], Saber [8], Matlab/Simulink [26] and LMS Motion [27]. Co-simulation between hardware and software: Hardware and software communicate with each other in order to implement real-time simulation [19,14].…”
Section: Definitions and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, airborne testing is often infeasible due to the certification processes associated with installation of testing equipment and the time commitment required of the aircraft. For these reasons, modeling of ACMs and environmental control systems is well documented [20][21][22][23][24], but often not validated with flight data.…”
Section: Empirical Validation Of Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they mostly entail ad hoc procedures, characterized by a poor automation level and largely neglect the interactions between architecture selection and the control algorithm. Some of these works seek to optimize the heat exchanger size for fuel efficiency, but pay little attention to control design [10]; other approaches only focus on the design of the control protocol, by either evaluating the tradeoffs between a finite number of candidate ECS architectures with respect to temperature control and efficiency [11], or by exploring control strategies based on fuzzy logic [12]. A correct-by-construction supervisory control protocol synthesized from linear temporal logic (LTL) requirements, along with a state-estimation algorithm has also been recently reported [13]; however, the architecture sizing problem is not taken into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%