2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic soil-structure interaction models for fragility characterisation of buildings with shallow foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first macro element was proposed by Nova & Montrasio [50] for a simplified case of footing and soil subjected to monotonic loading. Since then several macro element models have been proposed with different loading scenarios, foundation shapes and soil types; see for instance [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Substructure Methods For Evaluation Of Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first macro element was proposed by Nova & Montrasio [50] for a simplified case of footing and soil subjected to monotonic loading. Since then several macro element models have been proposed with different loading scenarios, foundation shapes and soil types; see for instance [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Substructure Methods For Evaluation Of Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method provides the coupling of the two separate models at the soil-structure interaction surface. Employing the substructure method, the numerical modeling of two substructures can be conducted considering the nonlinear behavior of the soil or the structure, as well [20]. In a recent study, the load distribution for capped pile and piled rafts in homogeneous layered soils was examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the nonlinear behavior of soil and its inherent damping make it possible to dissipate the seismic energy of input motions. However, a limited number of studies have focused on the effect of SSI at the collapse limit state (Pitilakis et al 2014;Karapetrou et al 2015;Cavalieri et al 2020). In addition, none of the aforementioned studies have investigated the adequacy of the SCWB provision for the flexible-base structures that are prone to pulse-type ground motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%