2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.233.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic stereometry of the temporomandibular joint

Abstract: Studies on jaw kinematics have provided a good understanding of the motion of the mandible in space, but are of little biomechanical relevance because they could not relate the movements to anatomic structures. This is possible by the combination of three-dimensional reconstructions of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anatomy with jaw motion recordings. This technique allows us to analyze the variation of the relationship between the articular surfaces, providing indirect insight into disk deformation during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work, the complex TMJ disc deformation, and thus indirectly its loading, has been studied quantitatively from in vivo data by coupling magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and jaw-tracking of human subjects (Gallo et al, 2000;Gallo, 2005;Gallo et al, 2006;Palla et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, the complex TMJ disc deformation, and thus indirectly its loading, has been studied quantitatively from in vivo data by coupling magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and jaw-tracking of human subjects (Gallo et al, 2000;Gallo, 2005;Gallo et al, 2006;Palla et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on biomechanical reasoning, this could be viewed as a protective effect: With unilateral loading, BS lever arms of muscles are several times longer than WS lever arms [41]. Hence, if masseters on both sides act equally, as usually observed with bigger jaw gapes [36], the jaw tilts about the bitten object and lifts on the BS [27][28][29][30][31]. If the height of the WS fulcrum drops below an individual limit, the BS teeth apparently can come into contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this approximately isometric contraction [18,23,24], the jaw can tilt [15,18,25] about the compressed bolus which separates the teeth by some tenth of millimeters [26]. The tilting implies a slight elevation of the BS mandibular arch [27][28][29][30][31] which could result in direct BS tooth contacts [15,25]. To prevent occlusal damage, the BS force had to be limited while high chewing force [32] is applied on the working side (WS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we studied the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk deformations that occur during mandibular function by means of novel, 3-dimensional modelling software that processes data acquired by magnetic resonance imaging and jaw tracking (a system that allows observation of mandibular movement dynamically) [Palla et al, 2003;Gallo, 2005;Gallo et al, 2006]. These TMJ disk measurements were used to develop a rolling/plowing explant test system that is able to mimic the in vivo plowing effect that results from the combination of compression and sliding of the mandibular condyle on the TMJ cartilage disk [Colombo et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%