McConnell GC, So RQ, Grill WM. Failure to suppress lowfrequency neuronal oscillatory activity underlies the reduced effectiveness of random patterns of deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol 115: 2791-2802, 2016. First published March 9, 2012 doi:10.1152/jn.00822.2015.-Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the mechanisms of action of DBS are unknown. Random temporal patterns of DBS are less effective than regular DBS, but the neuronal basis for this dependence on temporal pattern of stimulation is unclear. Using a rat model of PD, we quantified the changes in behavior and single-unit activity in globus pallidus externa and substantia nigra pars reticulata during high-frequency STN DBS with different degrees of irregularity. Although all stimulus trains had the same average rate, 130-Hz regular DBS more effectively reversed motor symptoms, including circling and akinesia, than 130-Hz irregular DBS. A mixture of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal responses was present during all stimulation patterns, and mean firing rate did not change during DBS. Low-frequency (7-10 Hz) oscillations of single-unit firing times present in hemiparkinsonian rats were suppressed by regular DBS, and neuronal firing patterns were entrained to 130 Hz. Irregular patterns of DBS less effectively suppressed 7-to 10-Hz oscillations and did not regularize firing patterns. Random DBS resulted in a larger proportion of neuron pairs with increased coherence at 7-10 Hz compared with regular 130-Hz DBS, which suggested that long pauses (interpulse interval Ͼ50 ms) during random DBS facilitated abnormal low-frequency oscillations in the basal ganglia. These results suggest that the efficacy of high-frequency DBS stems from its ability to regularize patterns of neuronal firing and thereby suppress abnormal oscillatory neural activity within the basal ganglia. These observations led to the hypothesis that DBS disrupts pathological patterns of neuronal activity Garcia et al. 2005;Hashimoto et al. 2003) and that the resulting regularization of neuronal activity is critical to the mechanism of DBS McCairn and Turner 2009).The importance of the temporal pattern of neuronal activity was reinforced in clinical studies comparing the effects of irregular and regular patterns of DBS on motor symptoms (Gross and McDougal 2013;Hess et al. 2013). Stimulation that was periodically cycled on and off was less effective than continuous DBS (Montgomery 2005), and random patterns of stimulation, even when delivered at a high frequency, were less effective than regular stimulation at reducing tremor (Birdno et al. 2008(Birdno et al. , 2012 and bradykinesia (Dorval et al. 2010). However, these studies did not reveal why irregular high-frequency stimulation was not sufficient to treat symptoms.In the present study, we quantified behavior and single-unit neuronal activity in the globus pallidus externa (GPe) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) during differen...