2018
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Surface Wetting and Heat Transfer in a Droplet-Particle System of Less Than Unity Size Ratio

Abstract: Dynamic surface wetting of particles in contact with droplet is a complex phenomenon ubiquitously encountered in many multiphase systems of industrial importance. In this study, we address this aspect by investigating impact behavior of a water droplet (diameter = 2.9 ± 0.1 mm) in the Weber number (We) range from ~4 to 104 on a stationary spherical brass particle (diameter = 10 mm) with and without heat transfer using a combination of high speed imaging and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling approach.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The jet cavity undergoes an expansion–contraction cycle: as large gas bubbles detach from the jet cavity tip, the jet cavity shrinks and expands again as gas enters the cavity from the nozzle and bubbles are captured by the cavity . Particles are entrained from the bed into the low-pressure cavity zone, just downstream of the nozzle tip. , The spray droplets mix imperfectly with the entrained particles and impact the bed particles at the end of the jet cavity. This accumulation of wet solids at the tip of the jet cavity means that the exact nature of the interactions between individual droplets and particles within the jet cavity is less critical than in processes such as FCC. Wet solids are continuously removed from the tip of the jet cavity in the wake of bubbles detaching from the cavity, in the form of wet agglomerates Figure shows X-ray pictures of a bubbling fluidized bed into which a tracer liquid is injected; the figure on the left-hand side shows the poor distribution that is obtained without atomization gas, while the figure on the right-hand side shows that with atomization gas.…”
Section: Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jet cavity undergoes an expansion–contraction cycle: as large gas bubbles detach from the jet cavity tip, the jet cavity shrinks and expands again as gas enters the cavity from the nozzle and bubbles are captured by the cavity . Particles are entrained from the bed into the low-pressure cavity zone, just downstream of the nozzle tip. , The spray droplets mix imperfectly with the entrained particles and impact the bed particles at the end of the jet cavity. This accumulation of wet solids at the tip of the jet cavity means that the exact nature of the interactions between individual droplets and particles within the jet cavity is less critical than in processes such as FCC. Wet solids are continuously removed from the tip of the jet cavity in the wake of bubbles detaching from the cavity, in the form of wet agglomerates Figure shows X-ray pictures of a bubbling fluidized bed into which a tracer liquid is injected; the figure on the left-hand side shows the poor distribution that is obtained without atomization gas, while the figure on the right-hand side shows that with atomization gas.…”
Section: Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven collision scenarios mapped against the outcome regime maps, 29 and a theoretical model for droplet rebound criterion 30 have been presented. Malgarinos et al, 31,32 Mitra et al, 33 and Mitra and Evans, 34 studied droplet collisions with a particle focusing on heat transfer and phase change behavior during a collision process. Various effects of impact conditions on collision phenomena have been investigated in the film boiling regime mainly based on numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various effects of impact conditions on collision phenomena have been investigated in the film boiling regime mainly based on numerical simulations. [31][32][33][34] Even though these studies mentioned above have significantly shed light on our understanding of fundamental knowledge associated with droplet impact with a particle, they have mostly focused on the behaviors of film thickness, lamella structure, collision outcomes, heat transfer and phase change characteristics rather than on the maximal spreading of dropletparticle collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also studied the droplet–particle with the size ratio close to 1 under normal and elaborated on the nucleate boiling, and gave a time‐dependent scheme for different stages. They then studied heat transfer in the film boiling state and measured dynamic contact angles, whose continuous time varying profile was used as a wall boundary condition for the cold interactions. They even experimented with glass particles hitting fixed larger‐diameter stationary water droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%