“…A relatively good result of 95.18% is provided by our DBRF on this dataset. It is slightly outperformed by ASF-TOP [17], MBSIF-TOP [16], MPCAF-TOP [20], FoSIG [63], V-BIG [64], HoGF 2D [25], HoGF 3D [25], DoDGF 2D [65], DoDGF 3D [65], DDLBP [66], novel LBP [18], MEWLSP [78], HILOP [73], MEMDP [76], RUBIG [74], B3DF_SMC [22], ICFV [24], and DT-RNNs [91] by 0.22%, 1.99%, 1.34%, 0.81%, 1.47%, 2.01%, 2.45%, 1.96%, 2.34%, 0.62%, 1.1%, 3.3%, 1.03%, 0.85%, 1.9%, 0.4%, and 1.33%, respectively. Despite the fact that many of these methods use SVM classifier, we think it is unworthy to significantly increase complexity and feature dimensionality for marginal performance improvement.…”