ESMO 2006 - 2006 IEEE 11th International Conference on Transmission &Amp; Distribution Construction, Operation and Live-Line Ma 2006
DOI: 10.1109/tdcllm.2006.340738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Thermal Rating System Relieves Transmission Constraint

Abstract: 1 1Abstract--Dynamic thermal line rating can optimize transmission operation by capturing previously unutilized line capacity while simultaneously improving system reliability. This paper will introduce a new system for dynamically determining the thermal rating of an overhead line. The paper will focus on a case study by describing how the system was used to relieve a transmission line constraint for a wind farm in the mid-western United States. A description of the particular constraint will be presented, fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[100] compares the traditional static rating and DLR, infers that a high capacity of overhead lines is not used during a large percentage of the time. Other similar studies in this line are the one performed in Spain by the University of Cantabria in [62], or still the research work carried out by Marshall Municipal Utilities, Shaw Energy Delivery Services and Xcel Energy in Minnesota (USA) [53]. The latter underlines that the actual line rating is above the static rating 96% of the time.…”
Section: Real Installationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[100] compares the traditional static rating and DLR, infers that a high capacity of overhead lines is not used during a large percentage of the time. Other similar studies in this line are the one performed in Spain by the University of Cantabria in [62], or still the research work carried out by Marshall Municipal Utilities, Shaw Energy Delivery Services and Xcel Energy in Minnesota (USA) [53]. The latter underlines that the actual line rating is above the static rating 96% of the time.…”
Section: Real Installationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Ampacity is calculated from the solar temperature T s and the calculated equivalent wind velocity [50,51]. Some application cases are shown in [45,52,53].…”
Section: Weather Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining with the comprehensive Vague value matrix, all schemes of Pareto optimal solution set are scored as shown in Table I. (2,5,8,11,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,35,38,41,44,47,49) 2 (3,8,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48) 3 (4,11,18,25,32,38,43,48) 4 (5,14,23,32,40,47) 5 (6,17,28,37,46) 6 (7,20,33,45) Six schemes of Pareto optimal solution set for communication network planning are listed in Table I. They don't dominate each other.…”
Section: Optimal Placement Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wireless sensors are put in various components of transmission lines to collect different physical and electrical parameters of the transmission lines (like sagging, vibration, electric current density, icing effects, vegetation, overheating, etc.) [1,2]. However, delivering the huge amount of collected information to the PCC, located miles away, in a long hop-by-hop linear topology is the most critical task in developing a smart transmission grid (STG) due to short ranges, low data rates, less successful data delivery, unbalanced energy consumption, and higher data collisions in wireless sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%