2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(01)00003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic transmission planning using a constrained genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement of computing technology with increasingly faster processors along with the option of solving the problem in a distributed computing environment has made possible to handle a bigger number of parameters and variables and even formulate the TEP as a multi-period optimization problem (Youssef, 2001;Braga & Saraiva, 2005). However, jointly with the above mentioned increasing competition brought by the deregulation, relevant aspects such as: the development of new small-scale generation technologies (Distributed Generation, DG), the improvement of power electronic devices (e.g.…”
Section: The Emerging New Tep Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of computing technology with increasingly faster processors along with the option of solving the problem in a distributed computing environment has made possible to handle a bigger number of parameters and variables and even formulate the TEP as a multi-period optimization problem (Youssef, 2001;Braga & Saraiva, 2005). However, jointly with the above mentioned increasing competition brought by the deregulation, relevant aspects such as: the development of new small-scale generation technologies (Distributed Generation, DG), the improvement of power electronic devices (e.g.…”
Section: The Emerging New Tep Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the classical approaches have attracted the application of different types of heuristic optimization techniques, which basically are designed to handle non-convex problems, since they have mechanisms to escape the local optimum [9], providing in addition a better computation performance as compared to conventional optimization techniques, at the expense of lower accuracy [7]. Recently developed approaches include genetic algorithms (GA) [10], simulated annealing [11], evolutionary particle swarm optimization (EPSO) [12], as well as hybrid techniques (i.e. joint solution of static and dynamic CTEP by using a combination of meta-heuristics and classical dynamic programming) [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, expansion costs and network losses are in conflict with each other, so the component losses in TNEP would be a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) function. Accordingly, the network planner can construct the lines with lower losses and higher cost or construct the lines with lower costs but higher losses (Shayeghi et al, 2008;Youseef, 2001). Another factor affecting TNEP is uncertainty over Garver's famous offering of innovative ideas in 1970, at the same time as oil-crisis planners were being considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%