2011
DOI: 10.4018/jdwm.2011040104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic View Management System for Query Prediction to View Materialization

Abstract: On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) systems based on data warehouses are the main systems for managerial decision making and must have a quick response time. Several algorithms have been presented to select the proper set of data and elicit suitable structured environments to handle the queries submitted to OLAP systems, which are called view selection algorithms to materialize. As users’ requirements may change during run time, materialization must be viewed dynamically. In this work, the authors propose and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important challenge is to adapt our approach for maintaining materialized views, considering the connection between multi-query optimization and the maintenance view problem. Finally, we are evaluating the impact of the query changes on our proposal (Daneshpour & Barforoush, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important challenge is to adapt our approach for maintaining materialized views, considering the connection between multi-query optimization and the maintenance view problem. Finally, we are evaluating the impact of the query changes on our proposal (Daneshpour & Barforoush, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Views Selection: There exist a great number of selection algorithms, taking account or not of constraints such as space and maintenance cost. For a complete classification, we refer to the survey paper of Mami et al (Mami & Bellahsene, 2012) which divides algorithms in the following categories: deterministic algorithms (Shukla & Deshpande & Naughton, 1998;Souza & Sampaio;1999;Theodoratos & Sellis 1997), randomized algorithms (Ioannidis & Kang, 1990), evolutionary algorithms (Horng & Chang & Liu & Kao, 1999) (Phan & Li, 2008), or with an unknown workload (Daneshpour & Barforoush, 2011;Lawrence & Rau-chaplin, 2008). 4.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm involves many factors but it doesnt consider some factors R. SABBAGH AND N. DANESHPOUR 503 like the cost of dropping the materialized view. One of the view selection algorithms predicts the next query and materializes related views according to the prediction [23]. But always the prediction isnt confident.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%