“…In the last two decades, researchers from multiple disciplines, such as cartography, GIS, computational geometry, transportation, and psychology, have carried out a large number of studies for schematic maps. The literature presents three primary themes: (1) effective design rules, principles, and/or frameworks for automated generation (e.g., Avelar & Hurni, 2006;Burch, Woods, Netzel, & Weiskopf, 2016;Li, 2015;Roberts, 2014b); (2) automated generation methods (e.g., Anand, Avelar, Ware, & Jackson, 2007;Brands, 2016;Galvao, Ramos, Lamar, & Taco, 2017;Hong, Merrick, & Nascimento, 2006;Lan, Li, & Ti, 2019;Li & Dong, 2010;Nöllenburg & Wolff, 2011;Stott, Rodgers, Martinez-Ovando, & Walker, 2011;Ti & Li, 2014;Ti, Li, & Xu, 2015;Ware, Taylor, Anand, & Thomas, 2006); and (3) usability and cognition issues (e.g., Burch, Kurzhals, Raschke, Blascheck, & Weiskopf, 2014;Delazari, Anand, Morley, 2014;Gallotti, Porter, & Barthelemy, 2016;Guo, 2011;Lloyd, Rodgers, & Roberts, 2018;Netzel et al, 2017;Roberts, 2014a;Roberts, Gray, & Lesnik, 2017;Roberts et al, 2013). This study focuses on the automated generation methods of schematic maps.…”