2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-014-1859-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical analysis of a prey–predator model with Beddington–DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge

Abstract: This paper discusses a prey-predator model with reserved area. The feeding rate of consumers (predators) per consumer (i.e., functional response) is considered to be Beddington-DeAngelis type. The Beddington-DeAngelis functional response is similar to the Holling type II functional response but contains an extra term describing mutual interference by predators. We investigate the role of reserved region and degree of mutual interference among predators in the dynamics of system. We obtain different conditions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…there may be mutual interference among predator species even in the presence of high prey density. Thus the present study generalizes the work done by Tripathi et al [15].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…there may be mutual interference among predator species even in the presence of high prey density. Thus the present study generalizes the work done by Tripathi et al [15].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the functional response also has an important impact on the behavior of biological dynamical systems [25][26][27][28][29]. We note the fact that, in biology, very high nutrient concentration may inhibit the growth of microorganisms actually, and the microorganisms will die eventually as the nutrient concentration increasing unlimitedly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Beddington (1975) and DeAngelis et al (1975) separately derived a response function that acclimate interference between predator (direct interactions in predators). Here the assumption is that individuals not only assign time to forage and process prey but also use some time fetching in encounters with predator (Beddington, 1975; DeAngelis et al, 1975; Tripathi et al, 2015). Thus, the expected consequence is that feeding rate of predator becomes free from the density of predator at the high density of prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%