2014
DOI: 10.1002/andp.201400093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical back‐action effects in low loss optomechanical oscillators

Abstract: The problem of the stability of a cavity optomechanical system based on an oscillator having at the same time low optical and mechanical losses is addressed. As it is the aim to extend the use of optical squeezing as a tool for improving quantum limited displacement sensing at low frequency, a family of opto-mechanical devices designed to work at frequencies of about 100 kHz was developed . The devices actually meet the initial design goals, but new requirements have emerged from the analysis of their behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, we mention another class of silicon microresonators, where requirements on losses are satisfied thanks to the use high-order torsional modes [48,49]. However, the presence of lower-order modes makes these systems unsuitable for the use in high-finesse optical cavities, due to the onset of complex dynamical instabilities [50]. A thorough discussion of the dynamics of a multimodal optomechanical system goes beyond the scope of this paper, and we only note that the introduction of on-chip seismic isolation forces us to consider the effect of some fixed and reproducible isolation mode, with the advantage of isolating the system from poorly reproducible modes of the wafer and of the sample holder.…”
Section: Effects Of Low-frequency Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, we mention another class of silicon microresonators, where requirements on losses are satisfied thanks to the use high-order torsional modes [48,49]. However, the presence of lower-order modes makes these systems unsuitable for the use in high-finesse optical cavities, due to the onset of complex dynamical instabilities [50]. A thorough discussion of the dynamics of a multimodal optomechanical system goes beyond the scope of this paper, and we only note that the introduction of on-chip seismic isolation forces us to consider the effect of some fixed and reproducible isolation mode, with the advantage of isolating the system from poorly reproducible modes of the wafer and of the sample holder.…”
Section: Effects Of Low-frequency Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 also highlights a further important feature of the device, namely that in the low-frequency range (up to the main oscillator mode) only the filters' vibration modes are present. Given that these modes are about 100 times heavier than the main oscillator mode, they do not affect significantly the cavity stability region [50] and allow one to reach the sensitivity floor at the oscillator frequency. The possibility to operate in a high-finesse cavity with relevant input power is demonstrated by the spectra in Fig.…”
Section: A Vibration Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В случае движущихся тел оно имеет свои особенности. В настоящее время интерес к этому вопросу стимулируется развитием микроэлектромеханических (МЭМС) и микрооптомеханических (МОМС) систем [1][2][3], исследованиями быстро вращающихся частиц в атомных ловушках [4,5] и астрофизическими приложениями [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The PDH signal is also bandpass filtered around 22 kHz, and added to the signal driving the intensity modulator of the noise eater acting on the main beam. We so implement a feedback cooling [38] on the wheel oscillator, with two purposes: firstly, we improve its dynamic stability, that is otherwise critical due to the combined effect of optomechanical interaction and frequency locking servo loop [39]. Secondly, we depress the fluctuations of the wheel oscillator, that would otherwise provide a major contribution to the overall cavity phase noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%