2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.023535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical dark sectors and neutrino masses and abundances

Abstract: We investigate generalized interacting dark matter-dark energy scenarios with a time-dependent coupling parameter, allowing also for freedom in the neutrino sector. The models are tested in the phantom and quintessence regimes, characterized by equations of state, w x < −1 and w x > −1, respectively. Our analyses show that for some of the scenarios, the existing tensions on the Hubble constant H 0 and on the clustering parameter S 8 can be significantly alleviated. The relief is either due to (a) a dark energy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analyses of the Pantheon data alone, as shown in Table 3, we find that m ν < 0.45 eV 95%C L (32) Which in comparison of previous model, IDE+ m ν , with m ν < 0.253 eV have been changed significantly, however it is close to the result of [189] where using same model, interacting scenario IDE1p + m ν + N e f f and using Planck 2018 data, have been obtained m ν < 0.438 eV at 95% CL The interesting result of our analysis is that for this model, the most stringent upper limit we have on this parameter is obtained for the data set combination C M B + B AO + Pantheon + CC in which m ν < 0.125 eV 95%C L (33) This result is in good agreement with the results of Planck 2018 [185], where the limit of the total neutrino mass is m ν < 0.12 eV at (95% C.L. using TT, TE, EE + lowE + lensing + BAO data) and close to the result of [121], where they also find the most stringent upper limit on this parameter for the same model, IDE+ m ν and the same data (CMB + Pantheon + CC data) with m ν < 0.15 eV at 95% CL.…”
Section: Ide+ M ν + N E F Fsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…From the analyses of the Pantheon data alone, as shown in Table 3, we find that m ν < 0.45 eV 95%C L (32) Which in comparison of previous model, IDE+ m ν , with m ν < 0.253 eV have been changed significantly, however it is close to the result of [189] where using same model, interacting scenario IDE1p + m ν + N e f f and using Planck 2018 data, have been obtained m ν < 0.438 eV at 95% CL The interesting result of our analysis is that for this model, the most stringent upper limit we have on this parameter is obtained for the data set combination C M B + B AO + Pantheon + CC in which m ν < 0.125 eV 95%C L (33) This result is in good agreement with the results of Planck 2018 [185], where the limit of the total neutrino mass is m ν < 0.12 eV at (95% C.L. using TT, TE, EE + lowE + lensing + BAO data) and close to the result of [121], where they also find the most stringent upper limit on this parameter for the same model, IDE+ m ν and the same data (CMB + Pantheon + CC data) with m ν < 0.15 eV at 95% CL.…”
Section: Ide+ M ν + N E F Fsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, the most general case is only realized when a time varying coupling parameter is considered, as there is no theoretical principle that can exclude this possibility. In references [662,663], the two following coupling functions were considered:…”
Section: Ivs and Ide With Variable Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above interaction models together with the variable coupling function were investigated for w DE = −1 (IVS), in reference [662], and for a constant value of w DE = −1 in reference [663] (IDE).…”
Section: Ivs and Ide With Variable Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both decaying (dark) matter solutions, as well as growing density-component solutions are very active areas of research. Because of this, we will not try to give an overview here of the candidates, but merely point to a number of recent papers [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] as a starting point for the interested reader, together with the more complete literature survey provided in [12]. By breaking Assumption 7, such solutions can increase H(0) relative to H(z) (where z > 0) more than would otherwise be possible.…”
Section: Breaking Post-recombination Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%