2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical diffraction of high-energy electrons investigated by focal series momentum-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy at atomic resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,38 For high convergence angles, it has been shown that proper adjustment of the probe focus position can mitigate the effects of probe broadening and maintain the qualitative accuracy expected for samples in the 5-20 nm thickness range. [38][39][40] In summary, we have applied 4D STEM electric field imaging to a (PTO) 16 /(STO) 16 superlattice with both a picometer-sized and a nanometer-sized electron probes, and observed different patterns in the electric field at atomic and nanometer scales. The electric field measured by a picometer-sized probe shows a vortex pattern and is mainly determined by the asymmetry introduced to lead atomic columns by the bonding configuration of lead 6s, lone-pair electrons, which generates a dipole in each unit cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…19,38 For high convergence angles, it has been shown that proper adjustment of the probe focus position can mitigate the effects of probe broadening and maintain the qualitative accuracy expected for samples in the 5-20 nm thickness range. [38][39][40] In summary, we have applied 4D STEM electric field imaging to a (PTO) 16 /(STO) 16 superlattice with both a picometer-sized and a nanometer-sized electron probes, and observed different patterns in the electric field at atomic and nanometer scales. The electric field measured by a picometer-sized probe shows a vortex pattern and is mainly determined by the asymmetry introduced to lead atomic columns by the bonding configuration of lead 6s, lone-pair electrons, which generates a dipole in each unit cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We note that the efficiency of information transfer in 4D-STEM experiments is highly dependent on the sample and experimental conditions, in particular, the convergence angle and diffraction space sampling [9,[14][15][16][17]. Experimental parameters, therefore, need to match each application case, and structural information out of 4D-STEM datasets usually needs to be extracted with appropriate post-acquisition algorithms, from using simple virtual apertures, and Bragg peak analysis [9], to momentum space weighting like first-or second-moment measurements [18,19] to more complex inverse problem solving including multi-slice ptychography [12,20]. Figure 1 illustrates examples of such 4D-STEM application cases that we have recently studied, ranging from momentum-resolved STEM imaging for revealing heavy and light elements simultaneously, to studying vacancies in 2D oxides with multi-slice ptychography reconstruction, to nano-crystalline thin film orientation mapping.…”
Section: Introduction 14d-stem Experiments For Materials Characteriza...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a) for dataset A. Electron-opticsrelated elliptical distortions at the level of the detector were accounted for by an anisotropic coordinate frame for the scattering angles. 20,21 Note that the azimuthal integration forms the basis for angle-resolved STEM (AR-STEM), which initially revealed the importance of inelastic scattering employing annular detectors. 13,22 By convention, the data are normalized to the incident intensity I 0 and to the solid angle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%