2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical processes in the ionosphere following the moderate earthquake in Japan on 7 July 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…В целом изложенные в статье результаты соответствуют результатам исследования эффектов в ионосфере другого землетрясения [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…В целом изложенные в статье результаты соответствуют результатам исследования эффектов в ионосфере другого землетрясения [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A negative disturbance of −5 TECu occurred on 7 April and a significant negative disturbance of −10 TECu occurred on 15 April. Figures [16][17][18] show the time series at AIRA, SHAO, and TSK2 stations which are slightly far from the epicenter. We can see a similar phenomenon to Figure 15.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ionospheric Disturbances Prior To 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events are widely observed and provide good research cases for studying various ionospheric variations [ 13 ]. Earthquakes and other natural disasters occur frequently in Japan, and there are often different types of widely observed and analyzed ionospheric disturbances that last for a period of time before the earthquake [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], which may be used as important bases for analyzing and forecasting earthquakes. When a geomagnetic storm occurs, strong ionospheric density irregularities are generated, showing depletions (bubbles), enhancements (blobs), and scintillation [ 17 , 18 ], and they are all formed in the F layer of the ionosphere [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 12:00 UT to 17:00 UT on 31 August 2019, virtually all propagation paths exhibited a quasiperiodicity in fD(t) at ~30 min period, T, and ~0.4-0.6 Hz amplitude, fDa. Given the fDa, the amplitude of variations in the electron density can be estimated by employing the following relation (Guo et al, 2019a(Guo et al, , 2020Chernogor et al, 2020):…”
Section: Wavelike Disturbance Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%