2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/10/p10030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical renormalization group study for a class of non-local interface equations

Abstract: We provide a detailed Dynamic Renormalization Group study for a class of stochastic equations that describe non-conserved interface growth mediated by non-local interactions. We consider explicitly both the morphologically stable case, and the less studied case in which pattern formation occurs, for which flat surfaces are linearly unstable to periodic perturbations. We show that the latter leads to non-trivial scaling behavior in an appropriate parameter range when combined with the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each curve S(q, t) in figure 4, the small q behavior corresponds to an uncorrelated interface, the crossover to correlated spectra moving to smaller q (larger length scales) as time proceeds. In our case, we obtain numerically α = 1.03 ± 0.06 and β = 0.93 ± 0.07, which are equal, within error bars, to the values α = β = z = 1 predicted by renormalization group (RG) calculations on equation (1) [20,23]. In order to obtain these exponent values, we have computed the roughness using the relation…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each curve S(q, t) in figure 4, the small q behavior corresponds to an uncorrelated interface, the crossover to correlated spectra moving to smaller q (larger length scales) as time proceeds. In our case, we obtain numerically α = 1.03 ± 0.06 and β = 0.93 ± 0.07, which are equal, within error bars, to the values α = β = z = 1 predicted by renormalization group (RG) calculations on equation (1) [20,23]. In order to obtain these exponent values, we have computed the roughness using the relation…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, the values α = z = 1 of the scaling exponents induce an interface which is disordered at all scales, while allowing at the same time for the identification of a 'typical' texture or motif. RG calculations and numerical simulations [21,23] both indicate the robustness of these exponent values, suggesting the universality of equation (13) as a description of a large class of nonequilibrium systems. Note, however, that interfaces developed under the same general physical principles as elucidated here, but for which the evolution equation is strongly, rather than weakly, nonlinear, may feature different morphological properties from the present cauliflower type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The latter breaks scale invariance at short time and length scales, which is restored back at large scales along the dynamics, as in the KS system [11]. Indeed, as borne out by numerical [30] and dynamic renormalization group [35] results, the asymptotic behavior of Eq. 2 fulfills the Family-Vicsek (FV) scaling ansatz [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…More recently, it has been successfully applied to understand e.g. the multiscale nature of fluctuating interfaces [45], kinetic roughening in surfaces controlled by unstable nonlocal interactions [46,47], or the interplay between noise and morphological instabilities in anisotropic pattern-forming systems [48], to cite a few examples.…”
Section: Dynamic Renormalization Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons behind such a simplicity are: (i) Given that in Eq. (24) λ y = 0 to begin with, parameter renormalization can be only due to the remaining nonlinearity λ x , which does not contribute to k 2 y order, hence ν y does not renormalize; (ii) at one-loop order there is a vertex cancellation [47] by which λ x does not renormalize either; (iii) as standard for conserved equations with non-conserved noise, since the lowest-order non-linear modification of the noise propagator is O(k 2 x ), the variance D is not affected and it does not renormalize either. Finally, the fixed points of the RG flow control the scaling behavior.…”
Section: A Systems With Shift Invariance: Conserved Akpz Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%