2014
DOI: 10.1177/2211068214546493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamically Optimizing Experiment Schedules of a Laboratory Robot System with Simulated Annealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is very common in several other SAA implementations (Peprah et al, 2017;Mahdi et al, 2017;Cabrera et al, 2014;Khairuddin and Zainuddin, 2019).…”
Section: The Geophysical Inversionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…which is very common in several other SAA implementations (Peprah et al, 2017;Mahdi et al, 2017;Cabrera et al, 2014;Khairuddin and Zainuddin, 2019).…”
Section: The Geophysical Inversionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This increases the stability of the workflow execution considerably. 4 The greatest uncertainties in the overall system arise from the transport processes. This includes, for example, necessary path changes of the mobile robots due to obstacles or necessary charging procedures.…”
Section: Architecture Of a Hierarchical Workflow Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the accomplishment, a dynamic scheduling was selected, which can initiate rescheduling procedures dependent on arising unexpected events to adapt the sequence for new environmental conditions. Compared to static scheduling solutions, this approach offers a higher agility and considerably increased system stability for the workflow execution , . Compared to the event‐driven rescheduling, the hybrid approach (periodical/event‐driven), according to , obtains better performance for the result, but requires a more frequent accomplishment of the rescheduling procedure instead.…”
Section: Hierarchical Workflow Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%