2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and evolution of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus following its introduction into a herd concurrently infected with both types 1 and 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…animals) within the herd. This approach was performed due to the recognized cross-reactivity between serological tests for the two PRRSV types [ 19 ], and the possible co-existence of PRRSV type 1 and 2 within herds [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…animals) within the herd. This approach was performed due to the recognized cross-reactivity between serological tests for the two PRRSV types [ 19 ], and the possible co-existence of PRRSV type 1 and 2 within herds [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian phylodynamic models have recently become well-established tools for studying the evolution of many infectious viral diseases. However, only a few studies have modeled the evolutionary dynamics of PRRSV (Tun et al, 2011 ; Shi et al, 2013 ; Brito et al, 2014 ; Nguyen et al, 2014 ; Chaikhumwang et al, 2015 ). Such studies revealed the potential of phylodynamic methods in answering many long-standing questions on the molecular epidemiology and evolution of PRRSV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, a few studies attempted to reconstruct the evolutionary history of PRRSv using Bayesian phylodynamic models 14,33,[38][39][40] . Such studies answered important a long-standing hypothesis on the evolutionary epidemiology of PRRSv, and subsequently encouraged the notion for such methods to be routinely applied in surveillance of field data with the ultimate goal of supporting risk-based interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%