2010
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.12-08-921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and Robustness of Familiarity Memory

Abstract: When presented with an item or a face, one might have a sense of recognition without the ability to recall when or where the stimulus has been encountered before. This sense of recognition is called familiarity memory. Following previous computational studies of familiarity memory, we investigate the dynamical properties of familiarity discrimination and contrast two different familiarity discriminators: one based on the energy of the neural network and the other based on the time derivative of the energy. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this “yes or no” discrimination task, the storage capacity has a different nature in the size scaling; it scales with N∧2 versus the N scaling occurring for recollection [70][72]. Thus, the same Hopfield network can both perform recollection (full pattern retrieval) and familiarity (the discrimination between one memory which was encoded before or just a novel one, never-seen before), and very interestingly the different memory nature has a very different storage capacity (N∧2 for familiarity vs N for recollection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this “yes or no” discrimination task, the storage capacity has a different nature in the size scaling; it scales with N∧2 versus the N scaling occurring for recollection [70][72]. Thus, the same Hopfield network can both perform recollection (full pattern retrieval) and familiarity (the discrimination between one memory which was encoded before or just a novel one, never-seen before), and very interestingly the different memory nature has a very different storage capacity (N∧2 for familiarity vs N for recollection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lisman and Idiart, 1995) as well as the multiple subpopulations network presented in this paper. Additionally, a different scaling of sensory coding capacity may arise if networks with lateral inhibition are employed in familiarity memory (Cortes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where µ i and σ 2 i represent mean and variance in group i (for further details see [54]). Therefore, the higher the SNR, the bigger separability of the two distributions.…”
Section: Separability Of Group Matrices Measured By the Signal To Noimentioning
confidence: 99%