2015
DOI: 10.1137/140980065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics for Systems of Screw Dislocations

Abstract: The goal of this paper is the analytical validation of a model of Cermelli and Gurtin [12] for an evolution law for systems of screw dislocations under the assumption of antiplane shear. The motion of the dislocations is restricted to a discrete set of glide directions, which are properties of the material. The evolution law is given by a "maximal dissipation criterion", leading to a system of differential inclusions. Short time existence, uniqueness, cross-slip, and fine cross-slip of solutions are proved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is commonly observed in numerical simulations that dislocations are attracted to free boundaries and that dislocations of opposite signs attract. In fact, as dislocations approach the boundary, or as dislocations with Burgers moduli of opposite sign approach one another, the renormalised energy diverges to −∞, and hence solutions of the evolution problem blow up and cease to exist, at least in the senses considered in [BFLM15,BvMM16]. In Lemma 2.4, we prove a gradient bound for the function h Ω for points in the vicinity of the boundary: this allows us to treat case (i).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is commonly observed in numerical simulations that dislocations are attracted to free boundaries and that dislocations of opposite signs attract. In fact, as dislocations approach the boundary, or as dislocations with Burgers moduli of opposite sign approach one another, the renormalised energy diverges to −∞, and hence solutions of the evolution problem blow up and cease to exist, at least in the senses considered in [BFLM15,BvMM16]. In Lemma 2.4, we prove a gradient bound for the function h Ω for points in the vicinity of the boundary: this allows us to treat case (i).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The model we consider was first proposed in full generality in [CG99], and studied extensively with specific choices of mobility in [BFLM15,BvMM16]. In particular, the latter two works prove existence of the evolution by differing methods, but acknowledge that blow-up of solutions appears to be a ubiquitous phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been done in several situations, ranging from point singularities in two dimensions [6,36,40] to a general three-dimensional setting [16]. Most of these results require the additional assumption that the admissible dislocation densities correspond to well separated dislocations in order to obtain compactness and to guarantee that sequences with bounded regularized elastic energy concentrate on dislocation lines with finite length and multiplicity, i.e., μ has finite total variation.…”
Section: Variational Models Of Dislocations and Plasticity In Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this criterion the velocity field might be not uniquely determined and the formulation needs to be relaxed. The effective dynamics is then described by a differential inclusion rather than a differential equation (as analysed in [6]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%