2018
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms6040105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of a Perturbed Microbial Community during Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chemically Defined Soluble Organic Compounds

Abstract: Knowledge of microbial community dynamics in relation to process perturbations is fundamental to understand and deal with the instability of anaerobic digestion (AD) processes. This study aims to investigate the microbial community structure and function of a thermophilic AD process, fed with a chemically defined substrate, and its association with process performance stability. Next generation amplicon sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes revealed that variations in relative abundances of the predomin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical feature of UASB processes appears also to be higher relative abundance of the phylum Euryarchaeota, which are normally found to be present in levels below 5% of the total community in CSTRs operating with different substrates, including when using the same primer sets as in the present study [36,44,52,60,61]. This higher share of archaea in UASB processes compared with CSTR processes might be explained by two essential differences between UASB and CSTR processes.…”
Section: Overall Microbial Community Structuresupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical feature of UASB processes appears also to be higher relative abundance of the phylum Euryarchaeota, which are normally found to be present in levels below 5% of the total community in CSTRs operating with different substrates, including when using the same primer sets as in the present study [36,44,52,60,61]. This higher share of archaea in UASB processes compared with CSTR processes might be explained by two essential differences between UASB and CSTR processes.…”
Section: Overall Microbial Community Structuresupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These two primer sets have previously been shown to adapt well to Illumina sequencing. Moreover, the archaeal community generated from these two primer sets is generally consistent, but with higher resolution in the results for primer set 516F and 915R [44,61,108,109]. However, the results of these two primer sets were somewhat contradictory for sample 1A_204.…”
Section: Possible Bias Introduced By Using Two Different Primers For mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast, they observed only minor changes in the bacterial composition [49], a fact that they attributed to the higher metabolic and therefore enzymatic versatility of the bacterial community compared to the methanogenic one [49]. However, propionate oxidation by syntrophic bacteria was also shown to be sensitive to trace element shortages [50,51]. This could explain why propionate persisted in all buffered variants until the end of incubation, while it was degraded in the unbuffered control.…”
Section: Impact Of P-buffermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The COD removal efficiency ranged from 56.6% to 81.9% across the experimental phases with different OLRs in RM, while it ranged only from 21.2% to 49.9% in RM. The observation of the lowest COD removal efficiency at an OLR of 0.25 g COD/L·d in RT may be attributed to temperature stress on the inoculum microorganisms collected from a mesophilic digester [23]. Microorganisms that are not thermotolerant may have been damaged in RT by exposure to thermophilic temperature, which can result in cell death and release of cell debris and thus adversely affect the treatment performance and effluent quality.…”
Section: Methanogenic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%