Dynamics of exclusion and everyday bordering through Schengen visas

Özdemir, Zelal; Ayata, Ayşe

doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.05.005

Cited by 13 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Arguably, the investigation of the discourse referring to the EU visa liberalization provides a perspective on the construction of new policies by the EU as well by the EU candidate countries, such as Serbia and Turkey, and by those countries that aspire to the EU candidate status such as Ukraine. The framing of the EU visa liberalization has been profoundly elucidated (Đurović-Silaški 2012, Finotelli-Sciortino 2013, Kortenska et al 2016, Özdemir-Ayata 2017. The issue of the EU visa liberalization process with Serbia is investigated by Đurović and Silaški (2012) by means of identifying conceptual construals, in particular, metaphors in the framing of Serbian political discourse associated with the visa-free movement of Serbian citizens.…”

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Specifically, Finotelli and Sciortino (2013: 80) posit that the EU's visa policies towards non-EU countries on the visa-mandatory list are evocative of "the powerful icon (…) of 'Fortress Europe', a space where the free mobility of insiders is matched by an ever-increasing closure towards outsiders". The frame Fortress is echoed in a research paper by Özdemir and Ayata (2017), who examine the dynamics of exclusion and everyday bordering through Schengen visas. It is suggested by Özdemir and Ayata (2017) that the frame Fortress is reflective of the otherness and non-Europeanness of Turkey.…”

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The frame Fortress is echoed in a research paper by Özdemir and Ayata (2017), who examine the dynamics of exclusion and everyday bordering through Schengen visas. It is suggested by Özdemir and Ayata (2017) that the frame Fortress is reflective of the otherness and non-Europeanness of Turkey. The Fortress appears to reiterate and reinforce the image of exclusion of those passport holders who live outside of the metaphoric Fortress Europe (Özdemir-Ayata 2017).…”

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The issue of illegal migration to the EU has attracted a substantial volume of research in linguistics (Abid et al 2017, Charteris-Black 2006, Sciortino-Colombo 2004. At the same time, the issues of legal border crossing, legal visitors with Schengen visas, and visa liberalization with the EU are less numerous in linguistics, and, in particular, discourse studies (Đurović-Silaški 2012, Jansen 2009, Kostovicova 2014, Özdemir-Ayata 2017.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Political discourse associated with visa liberalization has been addressed in research literature in linguistics and political discourse (Aydın-Düzgit 2016, Baysan 2013, Đurović-Silaški 2012, Happ-Bruns 2017, Jansen 2009, Kortenska et al 2016, Kostovicova 2014, Özdemir-Ayata 2017, Scott 2017, Vieira 2016. Previous studies indicate that the issue of visa liberalization with the EU has dominated political discourse in a number of European non-EU countries, for instance, in Serbia (Đurović-Silaški 2012, Jansen 2009, Kortenska et al 2016, Kostovicova 2014, Turkey (Aydın-Düzgit 2016, Batalla-Adam 2017, Baysan 2013, Tsarouhas 2018), and Ukraine (Burlyuk-Shapovalova 2017, Chaban et al 2017, Kleinschnitger-Knodt 2018, Scott 2017, Vieira 2016.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Framing of the EU Visa Liberalization with Ukraine

Капранов

2018

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a qualitative study aimed at investigating the framing of political discourse associated with the EU visa liberalization with Ukraine. This study seeks to address the framing of the EU visa liberalization process in Ukrainian political discourse published online by several leading high-quality Internet news resources, e.g. 112ua, Censor.Net, or UNIAN. The corpus of the study is comprised of 34 articles that have been analysed from the vantage point of framing methodology developed by Entman (2004) and Dahl (2015). The results of the qualitative investigation reveal that Ukrainian political discourse associated with the EU visa liberalization with Ukraine is framed by means of such frames as the Building, the Divorce, the European Integration, the Game, the Home, the Hostage, and the Journey. These findings are further presented and discussed in the article.

show abstract

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Framing Of Political Discourse Associated With the Eu VImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Framing of the EU Visa Liberalization with Ukraine

Капранов

2018

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Irregular Migrants’ Precarious Access to Health Care in the Norwegian Welfare State

Bendixsen

2024

Overlapping Inequalities in the Welfare State

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘Everyday Bordering’ in England, Sweden and Bulgaria: Social Work Decision-Making Processes When Working with Migrant Family Members

Walsh

Khoo

Nygren

2021

Int. Migration & Integration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global movement of people is a growing feature of contemporary life, and it is essential that professionals providing support services know how to best engage with migrant families. However, despite globalisation and the related processes of de-bordering, borders continue to remain significant and, in contemporary life, the ways in which immigration is controlled and surveilled—bureaucratically and symbolically—are multiple. The paper draws on data gathered in the immediate period following the so called 2015 European ‘migration crisis’ and examines whether and in what ways social workers in three European countries—Bulgaria, Sweden and England—enact bordering in their work with migrant family members. We apply the concept of ‘everyday bordering’ to the data set: whilst borders are traditionally physical and at the boundary between nation states, bordering practices increasingly permeate everyday life in bureaucratic and symbolic forms. Overall, the data show that everyday bordering affects social work practice in three ways: by social workers being required to engage in bordering as an everyday practice; by producing conditions that require social workers to negotiate borders; and in revealing aspects of symbolic everyday bordering. Our analyses shows that ‘everyday bordering’ practices are present in social work decision-making processes in each country, but the forms they take vary across contexts. Analysis also indicates that, in each country, social workers recognise the ways in which immigration control can impact on the families with whom they work but that they can also inadvertently contribute to the ‘othering’ of migrant populations.

show abstract

Dynamics of exclusion and everyday bordering through Schengen visas

Cited by 13 publications

References 21 publications

The Framing of the EU Visa Liberalization with Ukraine

The Framing of the EU Visa Liberalization with Ukraine

Irregular Migrants’ Precarious Access to Health Care in the Norwegian Welfare State

‘Everyday Bordering’ in England, Sweden and Bulgaria: Social Work Decision-Making Processes When Working with Migrant Family Members

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About