Dynamics of percolation phenomena in colloidal printing inks

Daniele, Michael A.; Foguth, Alexandra L.; Rungta, Parul; Bandera, Iurii; Tsyalkovskyy, Volodymyr; Foulger, Stephen H.

doi:10.1117/12.842647

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This parameter shows the main change in the viscosity value after adding the critical volume of filler particles. The rheological properties of pastes are significantly different after crossing the percolation threshold (Daniele et al , 2010; Sumfleth et al , 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) are becoming more popular as the material of the functional phase in screen printing heterophase materials, because of their unique mechanical and electrical properties (Olszewska and Salski Bartłomiej, 2013; Janczak et al , 2014, 2017; Leng et al , 2016; Pepłowski et al , 2017). However, in the literature we find research related to only the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds of graphite, carbon nanotubes or carbon black polymer composites (Bauhofer and Kovacs, 2009; Daniele et al , 2010; Sumfleth et al , 2011; Penu et al , 2012; Mun et al , 2014), and graphene pastes have not yet been thoroughly tested. Therefore, the paper presents the analysis of the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds in the polymer–graphene screen printing pastes and the analysis of the relation between these two parameters.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electrical and rheological percolation threshold of graphene pastes for screen-printing

Dybowska-Sarapuk

Janczak

Podsiadły

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose A comparison of electric and viscosity percolation threshold is crucial from the scientific and technical points of view to understand the features and capabilities of heterogeneous graphene composite materials and properly select the functional phase volume. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present the analysis of the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds in the polymer–graphene screen printing pastes and the analysis of the relation between these two parameters. Design/methodology/approach In the paper, the properties of polymer-based pastes with graphene nanoplatelets were tested: paste viscosity and printed layers conductivity. The tests of pastes with different filler content allowed to determine both the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds using power law, according to Kirkpatrick’s percolation model. Findings The electrical percolation threshold for graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) in the composite was 0.74 Vol.% when the rheological percolation threshold is observed to be at 1.00 Vol.% of nanoplatelets. The percolation threshold values calculated using the Kirkpatrick’s percolation model were 0.87 and 0.5 Vol.% of GNPs in the paste for electrical and rheological percolation thresholds, respectively. Originality/value Recently, GNPs are becoming more popular as the material of the functional phase in screen printing heterophase materials, because of their unique mechanical and electrical properties. However, till date no research presented in the literature is related to the direct comparison of both the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds. Such analysis is important for the optimization of the printing process toward the highest quality of printed conductive paths, and finally the best electrical properties.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%