Electrical and rheological percolation threshold of graphene pastes for screen-printing

Abstract

Purpose A comparison of electric and viscosity percolation threshold is crucial from the scientific and technical points of view to understand the features and capabilities of heterogeneous graphene composite materials and properly select the functional phase volume. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present the analysis of the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds in the polymer–graphene screen printing pastes and the analysis of the relation between these two parameters. Design/methodology/approach In the paper, the properties of polymer-based pastes with graphene nanoplatelets were tested: paste viscosity and printed layers conductivity. The tests of pastes with different filler content allowed to determine both the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds using power law, according to Kirkpatrick’s percolation model. Findings The electrical percolation threshold for graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) in the composite was 0.74 Vol.% when the rheological percolation threshold is observed to be at 1.00 Vol.% of nanoplatelets. The percolation threshold values calculated using the Kirkpatrick’s percolation model were 0.87 and 0.5 Vol.% of GNPs in the paste for electrical and rheological percolation thresholds, respectively. Originality/value Recently, GNPs are becoming more popular as the material of the functional phase in screen printing heterophase materials, because of their unique mechanical and electrical properties. However, till date no research presented in the literature is related to the direct comparison of both the electrical and rheological percolation thresholds. Such analysis is important for the optimization of the printing process toward the highest quality of printed conductive paths, and finally the best electrical properties.

Carbon-Based Composites with Biodegradable Matrix for Flexible Paper Electronics

“…The last material was type C graphene nanoplatelets (GNP), commercially purchased from CheapTubes, Grafton, MA, USA. They were selected based on previous research conducted by our research team [ 40 , 41 ]. Materials printed on the substrates are shown in Figure 1 .…”

Investigation of Carbon-Based Composites for Elastic Heaters and Effects of Hot Pressing in Thermal Transfer Process on Thermal and Electrical Properties

“…Three types of material were chosen for conductive components of produced composites. Graphene nanoplatelets type C (GNP C), acquired commercially from CheapTubes, Grafton, MA, USA, was chosen based on previous research [19][20][21]. Following successful results in conductive composites research [22][23][24][25], conductive soot, purchased as Carbon Black (CB) from Graphene Laboratories Inc., Calverton, NY, USA, was chosen.…”

Design of bilayer graphene nanoribbon tunnel field effect transistor

“…Thus, GNR is potential candidate for using the channel material in FETs. It is worth noting that the graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) is also one of material from graphene which can be generated by unzipping of stacked graphene nanofibers (Chee et al , 2014; Dybowska-Sarapuk et al , 2019). However, the GNP has its own limitations which are not suitable to design FETs.…”