1994
DOI: 10.1364/josab.11.001356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of reverse saturable absorption and all-optical switching in C_60

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of the excited-to groundstate absorption cross section for C 60 was calculated as k » 5.2 ± 0.6. This is acceptable, given that the S 1 to T 1 transition is on the order of 1.2 ns, [41] and thus the static-case model applied here does not approach the dynamic solution for this compound. The pumped excited states accessed here probably have both excited singlet-and triplet-state contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of the excited-to groundstate absorption cross section for C 60 was calculated as k » 5.2 ± 0.6. This is acceptable, given that the S 1 to T 1 transition is on the order of 1.2 ns, [41] and thus the static-case model applied here does not approach the dynamic solution for this compound. The pumped excited states accessed here probably have both excited singlet-and triplet-state contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, Shirk et al [12] argue that the r ex /r 0 ratio does not characterize the strength of the nonlinear absorption, and suggest that the cross section difference (r ex ± r 0 ) is a more useful indicator of limiting action. Henari et al [15] quote the r ex /r 0 ratio as 2.9 for C 60 under 0.5 ns irradiation at 520 nm, while Li et al, [41] using values measured by Ebbesen et al, [42] estimate r T /r 0 to be~3.2 and r S /r 0 to bẽ 5.7 (r T and r S are the excited triplet and singlet state absorption cross sections, respectively). In phthalocyanines the largest r ex /r 0 ratio reported was 33 by Shirk et al [12] for tBu 4 -PcInCl under 532 nm irradiation (uncertainty not estimated).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For thick samples, this would imply integration of appropriate differential equations. [11] However, to capture the essential ingredients of the phenomenon, one can use the expression for thin films with an effective value for the sample thickness. For fluence values F o exceeding F S we get Equation (2) where N o is the…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6, 9±14] C 60 , in fact, exhibits a broad absorption spectrum, characterized by strong absorptions in the UV region and weaker absorptions extending over most of the visible region [15] where the first singlet excited state and the lowest energy triplet state show cross-sections larger than that of the ground state. [16] Since the efficient intersystem crossing from the singlet to the lowest triplet state (f ST b 0.9) occurs in about 1 ns, [15] the RSA observed on the picosecond time-scale is related to the singlet exited state, [11,14] whereas that observed on the nanosecond time-scale relates to the lowest triplet state. [6,14] At large input fluences (above some J cm…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that all C 60 molecules reside in S 0 in thermodynamic equilibrium. After pumped by a 532 nm laser pulse, some of the solute molecules are promoted via one-photon absorption to |m)S 1 , from which they relax to |0)S 1 within a few ps [13], and then undergo the following three relaxation processes. Firstly, they decay to S 0 via radiative relaxation (RR) and internal conversion (IC) with a composite rate of…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%