“…Due to the inherent flexibility of the messenger cable and the kinematic constraint provided by the clamp, the two sides of the damper basically behave as uncoupled planar cantilevers, with inertial bodies at their ends providing lumped translational and rotational masses, and subjected to a motion of the support. Within this context, the motion mass 2 mass 1 of the th ( = 1, 2) inertial body of the damper, as it is customary in the modelling of Stockbridge dampers (see, e.g., [11]), can be completely described by specifying the vertical displacement ( ) of its centroid and the rotation ( ). It is also convenient to introduce for each side of the messenger cable the relative transverse displacement, V ( ), of the tip with respect to the clamped sections .…”