2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the cavity and the surface film for impingements of single drops on liquid films of various thicknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 b), where the cavity collapse time is dramatically increased for higher Weber numbers, although it has essentially no influence on the dimensionless cavity formation time. All these observations are consistent with the conclusions in van Hinsberg et al 10 The centerline sub-cavity film thickness has also been analyzed as a ratio to initial film thickness (h/h 0 ). Effects of variations of h 0 * and Weber number on this ratio are shown in Figs.…”
Section: B Centerline Sub-cavity Liquid Film Thickness Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…19 b), where the cavity collapse time is dramatically increased for higher Weber numbers, although it has essentially no influence on the dimensionless cavity formation time. All these observations are consistent with the conclusions in van Hinsberg et al 10 The centerline sub-cavity film thickness has also been analyzed as a ratio to initial film thickness (h/h 0 ). Effects of variations of h 0 * and Weber number on this ratio are shown in Figs.…”
Section: B Centerline Sub-cavity Liquid Film Thickness Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…10 This phenomenon is observed in the present data. The effects of varying the Weber number and initial film thickness on the resulting centerline sub-cavity film thickness histories have been analyzed.…”
Section: B Centerline Sub-cavity Liquid Film Thickness Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been recently shown that the expression for the evolution of the lamella thickness in the form h ∼ t −2 , obtained in Yarin & Weiss (1995) from the remote inviscid solution, agrees very well with experimental and numerical data (Bakshi, Roisman & Tropea 2007;Roisman et al 2009;van Hinsberg et al 2010). Therefore, the flow in the lamella generated by high Reynolds drop collision can be described well by (4.12) with A = 1.…”
Section: Thickness Of the Lamellasupporting
confidence: 73%