Dynamics of the evolution of the strategic management concept: From the planning school to the neostrategic approach

Abstract

Purpose: Strategic management has been developing in business theory and practice for over 50 years. Presently, it constitutes the main area of research interest in management science. The contemporary conditions of business operations create new challenges for strategic management, such as the use of dynamic capabilities in strategy building, relational strategies, networking of organizations, technology development and automation of processes, and global strategies. These challenges are often referred to as neostrategic management. The purpose of this publication is to present the findings of research concerning new strategic management concepts and challenges. Methodology: The main research method of this article was a narrative literature review. On the basis of the research, the development of the concepts as well as contemporary trends and challenges of strategic management were characterized. There is also a synthesis of the problems and research results presented in the articles in this special issue of JEMI. Findings: Various schools and approaches to strategy formulation have been created. They indicate different factors that allow for success in strategic management such as: setting long-term goals, selection of programs and their execution plans (planning school); connection of the enterprise with the environment (evolutionary school); focusing attention on competitive advantage and achieved performance (position-based school); focus on one’s own resources and competences (resource school); use of opportunities and creating innovation (simple rules school); selection of the best option and orientation in business management (real options school); or eclectic perspectives, integrating the listed approaches. The strategic management concept has two dimensions. The first dimension is related to the emergence of subsequent, new strategic management concepts, which often hark back to the previous schools and approaches. The second dimension of development applies to operationalization and adjustment of the previous concepts to the changing conditions. Implications for theory and practice: The paper characterizes the research results presented in the articles included in this JEMI issue. They deal with various problems and challenges in the field of strategic management, such as the relationship between market dynamics, market orientation and performance of enterprises; the innovativeness of companies as a contemporary strategic orientation of companies; the strategy implementation and the management of the organization change; problems of strategic management of the development of the city. Originality and value: The problems presented in the study relate to challenges and new concepts in strategic management. They enrich the existing knowledge on the development of strategic management, and also create inspiration for further research in this area.

The Role of Pro-Innovative HR Practices and Psychological Contract in Shaping Employee Commitment and Satisfaction: A Case from the Energy Industry

“…At the same time, a certain group of HR practices is seen as particularly supportive of organisational innovation [53]. In the managerial dimension, innovation is the ability to recognise and respond not only to current, but also future needs and challenges [54,55]. Research by Oladapo and Onyeaso [56], for example, confirms the link between high performance work practices and organisational innovation.…”

The practical relevance of strategy education: Evidence from the lived experiences of business school alumni

“…As can be seen from Figure 2, practical relevance is encapsulated in the themes of the theoretical foundations of strategy, contextual conditions of strategy practice and the inventive use of strategy theory by strategy practitioners. Antithetical to the established dogma that strategy is a normative phenomenon (George, 2021; Kafel and Ziębicki, 2021; Kools and George, 2020), these themes capture the essential characteristics of strategy as emergent, situated and idiosyncratic. As management education is an applied science, practical relevance should be its hallmark (Nicolai and Seidl, 2010).…”

Innovative Management Strategies in Contemporary Organizations: A Review: Analyzing the Evolution and Impact of Modern Management Practices, With an Emphasis on Leadership, Organizational Culture, and Change Management

“…The evolution of management strategies over the years reflects the dynamic nature of business and the continuous adaptation to changing market conditions and technological advancements. Kafel and Ziębicki (2021) provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of strategic management, tracing its development from the planning school to the contemporary neostrategic approach. This evolution signifies the shift from traditional, linear planning methods to more dynamic, flexible, and holistic strategies that incorporate dynamic capabilities, relational strategies, and technology development.…”