2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00071-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the strategic group membership–performance linkage in rapidly changing environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that the results of this study, along with more positive evidence of performance differences in recent studies (e.g., Nair and Kotha, 2001), provides a rationale for reexamining the performance consequences of strategic group membership using not only improved financial market-based performance constructs but also improved methods for forming groups (e.g., Zuniga-Vicente et al, 2004). Indeed, industries and databases previously studied, such as retailing (Athanassoupoulos, 2003), insurance (Fiegenbaum andThomas, 1990, 1995) and steel (Nair and Kotha, 2001), should be the subjects of enquiry with the aim of establishing a more consistent and cumulative stream of evidence to support or refute the relationship between strategic group membership and performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We suggest that the results of this study, along with more positive evidence of performance differences in recent studies (e.g., Nair and Kotha, 2001), provides a rationale for reexamining the performance consequences of strategic group membership using not only improved financial market-based performance constructs but also improved methods for forming groups (e.g., Zuniga-Vicente et al, 2004). Indeed, industries and databases previously studied, such as retailing (Athanassoupoulos, 2003), insurance (Fiegenbaum andThomas, 1990, 1995) and steel (Nair and Kotha, 2001), should be the subjects of enquiry with the aim of establishing a more consistent and cumulative stream of evidence to support or refute the relationship between strategic group membership and performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Teece et al (1997) identified that dynamic capabilities are a source of sustainable advantage in times of rapid change. However, in the empirical studies of strategic groups, dynamic capabilities have only recently been taken into account (Lee et al, 2002;Athanassopoulos, 2003;Zuniga-Vicente et al, 2004). Lee et al (2002) develop a simulation model to examine conditions under which strategic groups emerge and their performance differences persist.…”
Section: Literature Review: Performance Differences Across Strategic mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Es así como el impacto de la pertenencia a un grupo sobre el desempeño empresarial ha sido un tema central en la literatura sobre grupos estratégicos (Hervás et al, 2006;Pereira et al, 2011). Sin embargo, la evidencia empírica disponible es contradictoria, por cuanto algunos estudios han encontrado diferencias de desempeño significativas entre los grupos estratégicos (Oustapassidis, 1998;Coombs et al, 2004;Dikmen et al, 2009), mientras que otros no han llegado a resultados concluyentes (Peteraf & Shanley, 1997;Zúñiga-Vicente et al, 2004;Claver et al, 2006). La inconsistencia de los resultados puede ser atribuida a diferentes factores.…”
Section: Grupos Estratégicos Y Desempeñounclassified