2021
DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.321590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of transmission of COVID-19 cases and household contacts

Abstract: Objective: To study the transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among 101 confirmed cases and their 387 household contacts and to determine risk factors associated with secondary attack among the household contacts. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1st 2021 to February 28th 2021, among 101 SARS-CoV-2 cases and 387 household contacts who were followed up for 14 days from the last day of contact with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, 29 studies from 16 countries (Australia [17], Bosnia and Herzegovina [18], Brazil [19], Canada [20], China [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], Greece [29,30], India [31], Israel [32], Japan [33,34], Malaysia [35], the Netherlands [36], Norway [37], Singapore [38], Spain [39], the United Kingdom (UK) [40,41] and the US [42][43][44][45]) were subjected to analysis for SAR in the period defined as pre-VOC. Twenty-three studies involving 12 countries (Denmark [46][47][48][49], Germany [50], India [51], Israel [52], Japan [53], the Netherlands [54,55], Norway [56,57], Singapore [6], South Africa [58], Thailand [59], the UK [60,61] and the US…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, 29 studies from 16 countries (Australia [17], Bosnia and Herzegovina [18], Brazil [19], Canada [20], China [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], Greece [29,30], India [31], Israel [32], Japan [33,34], Malaysia [35], the Netherlands [36], Norway [37], Singapore [38], Spain [39], the United Kingdom (UK) [40,41] and the US [42][43][44][45]) were subjected to analysis for SAR in the period defined as pre-VOC. Twenty-three studies involving 12 countries (Denmark [46][47][48][49], Germany [50], India [51], Israel [52], Japan [53], the Netherlands [54,55], Norway [56,57], Singapore [6], South Africa [58], Thailand [59], the UK [60,61] and the US…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 2097 records (1791 from PubMed, 306 from medRxiv, and 2 from reference lists of eligible articles) published between June 18, 2021, and March 8, 2022 (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). Fifty-eight new studies (eTable 2 in the Supplement) were combined with 77 studies from our previous review (see eTable 3 in the Supplement for references included from our previous review), with Figure 1 showing household SAR by study period, resulting in 135 total studies representing 1 375 806 contacts from 36 countries. Four of the new studies were preprints in our previous review that were subsequently published.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity analysis method was used to exclude and analyze the indicators of the groups included in the study, and the final results did not change much. So we Bi Q [19] 2020 China 2020-01-01/2020-02-12 1286 7.62% ABF 8 Liu R [20] 2020 China 2020-01-22/2020-02-14 4880 38.42 C 7 Liu T [21] 2020 China 2020-01-15/2020-03-15 11686 3.84% ACD 8 Wu Y [22] 2020 China 2020-01-23/2020-02-08 2994 4.81% ACE 9 Xin H [23] 2020 China 2020-01-20/2020-03-27 17.92% ACD 8 Burke RM [24] 2020 China 2020-01-01/2020-02-26 445 10.50% AB 8 Li W [25] 2020 China 2020-01-01/2020-02-20 392 16.30% A 7 Karumanagoundar [26] 2021 India 2020-03-14/2020-05-30 15702 3.81% AB 9 Luo L [27] 2020 China 2020-01-13/2020-03-06 3410 3.73% AEF 7 P Rajmohan [28] 2021 India 2021-01-01/2021-03-31 387 42.64% A 8 Jing COVID-19 = coronavirus disease-2019, QL [29] 2020 China 2020-01-07/2020-02-18 103 12.4% AC 9…”
Section: Meta-analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%