“…NAC, Norwegian Atlantic Current; WSC, West Spitzbergen Current; NCC, North Cape Current; NZC, Novaya Zemlya Current; PC, Persey Current; ESC, East Spitzbergen Current (after [Harris, Plueddemann, & Gawarkiewicz, 1998]) good proxy for E. huxleyi calcite concentration in the Barents Sea because the coccolithophore population there is of low diversity and overwhelmingly dominated by E. huxleyi (Giraudeau et al, 2016). Furthermore, satellite PIC products have been successfully validated during E. huxleyi blooms in the Barents Sea (Burenkov, Kopelevich, Rat'kova, & Sheberstov, 2011;Giraudeau et al, 2016;Hovland, Dierssen, Ferreira, & Johnsen, 2013) and in other bloom areas (Balch et al, 2005;Holligan et al, 1993). The exclusion of PIC data in shallow coastal waters with bottom depth below 100 m helped minimize spurious high PIC concentrations caused by strong light backscattering from resuspended particles (Broerse et al, 2003) and excluded coastal fjords in which the coccolithophore population is more diverse than in offshore waters (Volent et al, 2011).…”