“…However, they were unable to conclusively reveal evidence of biogeographical trends along the colonic mucosa, and suggested that higher resolution studies using microarray and/or next-generation sequencing technologies, as well as alternative methods of data analysis, were needed. Both phylogenetic microarrays (Paliy et al, 2009;Rajilic-Stojanovic et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2010) and high-throughput sequencing methods are now used more frequently to examine gut microbiome diversity, but the development of robust quantitative methods to reveal the biogeographical features of the gut microbiota is considered a 'great challenge' and 'the diversity and biogeography of the gut microbiota needs to be defined at varying scales of resolution' (Peterson et al, 2008). Although some clustering and ordination methods of numerical ecology are commonly used to compare microbial community profiles through open source software (for example, QIIME (Caporaso et al, 2010)), and increasingly used in gut microbiomics research (Fuentes et al, 2008;Biagi et al, 2010;Janczyk et al, 2010), we contend that, in addition to those methods, there are additional useful numerical ecology methods that can be used.…”