2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78611-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysgraphia detection through machine learning

Abstract: Dysgraphia, a disorder affecting the written expression of symbols and words, negatively impacts the academic results of pupils as well as their overall well-being. The use of automated procedures can make dysgraphia testing available to larger populations, thereby facilitating early intervention for those who need it. In this paper, we employed a machine learning approach to identify handwriting deteriorated by dysgraphia. To achieve this goal, we collected a new handwriting dataset consisting of several hand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, irregularities in writing should not be filtered, but instead interpreted as they are relevant for detecting children with dysgraphia. The classification performances presented are a little bit below the ones given in some recent papers [3,34], but close or better than some others [16,[35][36][37], and they are presented in TABLE 6. The results in these papers are good and very interesting but each of these articles has a limitation that seems to make it unfit to be extended for a large-scale dysgraphia pre-diagnosis.…”
Section: Comments On the Feature Selected For The Final Modelsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Thus, irregularities in writing should not be filtered, but instead interpreted as they are relevant for detecting children with dysgraphia. The classification performances presented are a little bit below the ones given in some recent papers [3,34], but close or better than some others [16,[35][36][37], and they are presented in TABLE 6. The results in these papers are good and very interesting but each of these articles has a limitation that seems to make it unfit to be extended for a large-scale dysgraphia pre-diagnosis.…”
Section: Comments On the Feature Selected For The Final Modelsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…DYS/TD Repartition Model Used Score [11] 27/27 Random Forest 96.43% [12] 56/242 Random Forest 97.9% [13] 48/43 SVM (RBF Kernel) 82.51% [16] 24/971 RNN 90% 1 [13] 42/36 Random Forest 67% [14] 42/36 SVM 66% [14] 42/36 AdaBoost 64% [15] 57/63 Random Forest 77.6% 2 [15] 57/63 SVM 78.8% 2 [15] 57/63 AdaBoost 79.5% 2 [20] 122/458 SVM (RBF Kernel) 83%…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we have a labeled database, we worked with supervised machine learning algorithms for our study. Several classes of algorithms have been used in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][16]40], therefore 9 models were tested, with different sets of hyperparameters, to select the best ones for each model.…”
Section: Preprocessing Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using principal component analysis, Asselborn et al (21) defined three independent dimensions and four computerized scores related to kinematics, pressure, pen tilt, and static features to characterize dysgraphia. Several authors developed machine learning methods to diagnose children with dysgraphia based on handwriting on tablets (22)(23)(24). To our knowledge, the use of ICTs in a treatment perspective is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%