Dyslexia in the Workplace 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470669341.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyslexia in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of detail in intervention protocols and reliance on our interpretation of key phrases such as 'discussion' and 'reflection' to infer dialetic principles was a limitation of our synthesis. We note that grey literature was not included in this extraction and, though this was a deliberate attempt to isolate research based evidence regarding psychological variables to refute or vindicate contemporary practitioner guidance (McLoughlin & Leather, 2013;Moody, 2010) systematic review of practitioner evidence may yet strengthen our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lack of detail in intervention protocols and reliance on our interpretation of key phrases such as 'discussion' and 'reflection' to infer dialetic principles was a limitation of our synthesis. We note that grey literature was not included in this extraction and, though this was a deliberate attempt to isolate research based evidence regarding psychological variables to refute or vindicate contemporary practitioner guidance (McLoughlin & Leather, 2013;Moody, 2010) systematic review of practitioner evidence may yet strengthen our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%