2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysphonia Severity Index in Typically Developing Indian Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the small sample sizes of the ADHD and control groups, the interpretations of results are to be regarded as descriptive and not conclusive. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was run on each variable to determine the normality of the distribution [44] . A Levene's test was employed to evaluate whether the data seta had equal or unequal variances [44] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the small sample sizes of the ADHD and control groups, the interpretations of results are to be regarded as descriptive and not conclusive. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was run on each variable to determine the normality of the distribution [44] . A Levene's test was employed to evaluate whether the data seta had equal or unequal variances [44] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was run on each variable to determine the normality of the distribution [44] . A Levene's test was employed to evaluate whether the data seta had equal or unequal variances [44] . An independent t-test was conducted where the normality assumption was met, in order to detect for significant differences between the groups' acoustic means (Jitter % , Shimmer % , F0, NHR, Highest dB, Lowest dB, F-Hi and F-Lo) [44] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also due to the fact that the use of different analysis software influences the total DSI score. Considering the published studies and our own experience with the DSI as an outcome measure for voice quality, we have determined a score higher than 2.0 to be normal for the pediatric population . Of our study population, no less than 77% of the patients had a clinically significant voice disturbance with a DSI score below 2.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there are no internationally established norm values for the DSI in the pediatric population. In the few studies on the use of the DSI in children, the normal DSI values differ strongly . For this study, we presumed that a total DSI score under 2.0 is associated with significant voice disturbance in the pediatric population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%